Cited by 1,009Career Development and DiversityHigher Education Research StudiesHealth and Medical Research Impacts

Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning

Open access
Lopatto, David·2007·CBE—Life Sciences Education

Abstract

The present study examined the reliability of student evaluations of summer undergraduate research experiences using the SURE (Survey of Undergraduate Research Experiences) and a follow-up survey disseminated 9 mo later. The survey further examines the hypothesis that undergraduate research enhances the educational experience of science undergraduates, attracts and retains talented students to careers in science, and acts as a pathway for minority students into science careers. Undergraduates participated in an online survey on the benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Participants indicated gains on 20 potential benefits and reported on career plans. Most of the participants began or continued to plan for postgraduate education in the sciences. A small group of students who discontinued their plans for postgraduate science education reported significantly lower gains than continuing students. Women and men reported similar levels of benefits and similar patterns of career plans. Undergraduate researchers from underrepresented groups reported higher learning gains than comparison students. The results replicated previously reported data from this survey. The follow-up survey indicated that students reported gains in independence, intrinsic motivation to learn, and active participation in courses taken after the summer undergraduate research experience.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1187/cbe.07-06-0039

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]12. Mabrouk, P. A., and Peters, K. (2000). Student perspectives on undergraduate research (UR) experiences in chemistry and biology. CUR Quarterly 21, 25-33.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lopatto, D.
Affiliations
Grinnell College (US)
Corresponding author
Lopatto, David
Venue
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Published
2007-12
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
297-306
ISSN
1931-7913 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110645352
Cited by
1,009
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 80 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 27
FWCI
33.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CBE—Life Sciences Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
Keywords
undergraduate research experience, active learning, underrepresented minority students, gender differences, intrinsic motivation, student independence
MeSH terms
Career Choice, Education, Humans, Learning, Research Personnel, Science, Students, Teaching, Universities, Program Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review