Cited by 95Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology

Phosphatized Polar Lobe-Forming Embryos from the Precambrian of Southwest China

Chen, Jun-Yuan, Bottjer, David J., Davidson, Eric H., Dornbos, Stephen Q., Gao, Xiang, Yang, Yong-Hua, Li, Chia-Wei, Li, Gang +5 more·2006·Science

Abstract

In developing embryos of some extant spiralian animals, polar lobe formation is one of the symmetry-breaking mechanisms for segregation of maternal cytoplasmic substances to certain blastomeres and not others. Polar lobe formation leads to unique early cleavage morphologies that include trilobed, J-shaped, and five-lobed structures. Fossil embryos similar to modern lobeforming embryos are recognized from the Precambrian Doushantuo Formation phosphates, Weng'an, Guizhou Province, China. These embryos are abundant and form a developmental sequence comparable to different developing stages observed in lobe-forming embryos of extant spiralians. These data imply that lobe formation is an evolutionarily ancient process of embryonic specification.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1125964

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Doushantuo embryos include a cleavage-stage embryo that forms polar lobes, as do a variety of modern protostome eggs.

    “A cleavage-stage embryo that forms polar lobes, as do a variety of modern protostome eggs, is reproduced in Figure 3E (Chen et al. 2006)”

    From An integrated view of precambrian eumetazoan evolution (2009) · cites this paper as Chen et al. 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, J.-Y., Bottjer, D. J., Davidson, E. H., Dornbos, S. Q., Gao, X., Yang, Y.-H., Li, C.-W., Li, G., Wang, X.-Q., Xian, D.-C., Wu, H.-J., Hwu, Y.-K., & Tafforeau, P.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Institute of Evo/Developmental Biology, and State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China.
  • University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Science
Published
2006-06-16
Volume
312
Issue
5780
Pages
1644-1646
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2114435986
Cited by
95
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Keywords
embryo cleavage, symmetry breaking, Precambrian fossils, Doushantuo Formation
MeSH terms
Animals, Annelida, Blastomeres, China, Embryo, Nonmammalian, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Invertebrates, Mollusca, Phosphates, Platyhelminths, Geologic Sediments, Embryonic Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review