Cited by 259Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Eumetazoan fossils in terminal Proterozoic phosphorites?

Open access
Xiao, Shuhai, Yuan, Xunlai, Knoll, Andrew H.·2000·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Phosphatic sedimentary rocks preserve a record of early animal life different from and complementary to that provided by Ediacaran fossils in terminal Proterozoic sandstones and shales. Phosphorites of the Doushantuo Formation, South China, contain eggs, egg cases, and stereoblastulae that document animals of unspecified phylogenetic position; small fossils containing putative spicules may specifically record the presence of sponges. Microfossils recently interpreted as the preserved gastrulae of cnidarian and bilaterian metazoans can alternatively be interpreted as conventional algal cysts and/or egg cases modified by diagenetic processes known to have had a pervasive influence on Doushantuo phosphorites. Regardless of this interpretation, evidence for Doushantuo eumetazoans is provided by millimeter-scale tubes that display tabulation and apical budding characteristic of some Cnidaria, especially the extinct tabulates. Like some Ediacaran remains, these small, benthic, colonial fossils may represent stem-group eumetazoans or stem-group cnidarians that lived in the late Proterozoic ocean.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.250491697

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. [1]Xiao, S., Yuan, X., Steiner, M. & Knoll, A. H. (2000) J. Paleontol., in press.
  2. [2]Xiao S, Zhang Y, Knoll A H. Nature (London) 1998;391:553–558. [Google Scholar]
  3. [3]Zhang Y, Yin L, Xiao S, Knoll A H. Paleontological Soc Memoir. 1998;50:1–52. [Google Scholar]
  4. [5]Xue Y, Zhou C, Tang T. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica. 1999;16:1–4. [Google Scholar]
  5. [6]Xiao S, Knoll A H. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica. 1999;16:313–323. [Google Scholar]
  6. [8]Grotzinger J P, Bowring S A, Saylor B Z, Kaufman A J. Science. 1995;270:598–604. [Google Scholar]
  7. [10]Walter M R, Veevers J J, Calver C R, Gorjan P, Hill A C. Precambrian Res. 2000;100:371–433. [Google Scholar]
  8. [13]Tang T, Zhang J, Jiang X. Acta Stratigraphica Sinica. 1978;2:32–45. [Google Scholar]
  9. [14]Brasier M, Green O, Shields G. Geology. 1997;25:303–306. [Google Scholar]
  10. [15]Zhao Z, Xing Y, Ding Q, Liu G, Zhao Y, Zhang S, Meng X, Yin C, Ning B, Han P. The Sinian System of Hubei. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences Press; 1988. [Google Scholar]
  11. [16]Zhao Z, Xing Y, Ma G, Chen Y. Biostratigraphy of the Yangtze Gorge Area, (1) Sinian. Beijing: Geological Publishing House; 1985. [Google Scholar]
  12. [17]Awramik S M, McMenamin D S, Yin C, Zhao Z, Ding Q, Zhang S. Nature (London) 1985;315:655–658. [Google Scholar]
  13. [18]Chen M, Xiao Z. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica. 1992;31:513–529. [Google Scholar]
  14. [19]Conway Morris S, Robison R A. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions. 1988;122:23–84. [Google Scholar]
  15. [21]Xiao S, Knoll A H. J Paleontol. 2000;74:767–788. [Google Scholar]
  16. [22]Zhang Y, Yuan X, Yin L. Science. 1998;282:1783. [Google Scholar]
  17. [24]Zhu M, Qian Y, Jiang Z, He T. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica. 1996;13:241–254. [Google Scholar]
  18. [25]Müller K J. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser B Biol Sci. 1985;311:67–73. [Google Scholar]
  19. [26]Bengtson S. Lethaia. 1976;9:185–206. [Google Scholar]
  20. [27]Huesken T-C, Eiserhardt K-H. Acta Universitatis Carolinae. 1996;40:445–455. [Google Scholar]
  21. [28]Martill D M, Wilby P R. Kaupia Darmstädter Beiträger Naturgeschichte. 1994;4:71–77. [Google Scholar]
  22. [29]Yuan X, Hofmann H J. Alcheringa. 1998;22:189–222. [Google Scholar]
  23. [30]Xue Y-s, Tang T-f, Yu C-l. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica. 1992;31:530–539. [Google Scholar]
  24. [31]Li G, Xue Y, Zhou C. PalaeoWorld. 1997;7:29–37. [Google Scholar]
  25. [32]Barnes R D. Bull Mar Sci. 1977;27:340–343. [Google Scholar]
  26. [33]Hill D. In: Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part F, Coelenterata, Supplement 1, Rugosa and Tabulata, 2. Teichert C, editor. Lawrence, KS: Geological Society of America and University of Kansas; 1981. pp. F430–F669. [Google Scholar]
  27. [34]Lee D-J, Elias R J. J Paleontol. 2000;74:404–425. [Google Scholar]
  28. [35]Hartman W D, Goreau T F. Zoological Soc London Symposia. 1970;25:205–243. [Google Scholar]
  29. [36]Reitner J. Berliner Geowissenshaftliche Abhandlungen. 1992;1:1–352. [Google Scholar]
  30. [37]Cornelius P F S. North-west European Thecate Hydroids and Their Medusae: Keys and Notes for Identification of the Species, Part 2. Shrewsbury, England: Field Studies Council; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  31. [38]Szmant-Froelich A. Marine Biol. 1974;27:299–306. [Google Scholar]
  32. [39]Bischoff G C O. Senckenbergiana Lethaea. 1978;59:229–273. [Google Scholar]
  33. [40]Scrutton C T. Proc Yorkshire Geol Soc. 1997;51:177–208. [Google Scholar]
  34. [42]van Iten H. Palaeontology. 1991;34:939–954. [Google Scholar]
  35. [43]van Iten H, Cox R S, Mapes R H. Lethaia. 1992;25:135–144. [Google Scholar]
  36. [45]Buss L, Seilacher A. Paleobiology. 1994;20:1–4. [Google Scholar]
  37. [46]Hofmann H J, Narbonne G M, Aitken J D. Geology. 1990;18:1199–1202. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xiao, S., Yuan, X., & Knoll, A. H.
Affiliations
Tulane University (US)
Corresponding author
Knoll, Andrew H.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2000-11-28
Volume
97
Issue
25
Pages
13684-13689
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2004614425
Cited by
259
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
Doushantuo Formation, phosphate rock, early animal evolution, Ediacaran, sponge spicules, egg cases, diagenesis, tabulate corals, South China
MeSH terms
Animals, Cnidaria, Fossils, Gastrula, Minerals, Phosphates, Geologic Sediments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review