Cooperation, Punishment, and the Evolution of Human Institutions
Abstract
Reputation-based probabilistic punishment on the evolution of cooperation in the spatial public goods game,
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adding punishment can stabilise cooperation by reducing the benefit of defection.
“Adding punishment can stabilise cooperation by reducing the benefit of defection (Henrich 2006; Boyd and Richerson 1992).”
From Cultural Evolution of Religion, Spirituality and Ritual: Impacts On Human Cooperation (2024) · cites this paper as Henrich 2006
Cites
Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.90.4.980 · Cited by 4,416 · see citing works
Not By Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution
Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2004) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226712130.001.0001 · Cited by 2,793 · see citing works
Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem
Panchanathan, K., & Boyd, R. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02978 · Cited by 881 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bering, J. M. (2006) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x06009101 · Cited by 458 · see citing works
Mean Gods Make Good People: Different Views of God Predict Cheating Behavior
Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2011) · International Journal for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1080/10508619.2011.556990 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., McNamara, R. A., Slingerland, E., & Henrich, J. (2016) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x15000655 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationSocial Diversity and Social Preferences in Mixed-Motive Reinforcement Learning
McKee, K. R., Gemp, I., McWilliams, B., Duèñez-Guzmán, E. A., Hughes, E., & Leibo, J. Z. (2020) · International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems · doi:10.65109/dnuf7773 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Cooperation without punishment
Battu, B., & Rahwan, T. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-28372-y · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Dasgupta, N., & Musolesi, M. (2025) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-025-09698-5 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“However, cooperating can often appear illogical for individuals, especially in situations known as social dilemmas that embody conflicts between individual-payoff maximizing choices and group-payoff maximizing choices [4, 19].”
Cultural Evolution of Religion, Spirituality and Ritual: Impacts On Human Cooperation
McNamara, R. A. (2024) · KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie · doi:10.1007/s11577-024-00937-3 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Adding punishment can stabilise cooperation by reducing the benefit of defection (Henrich 2006; Boyd and Richerson 1992).”
Gupta, P., Zhong, Q., Yakura, H., Eisenmann, T., & Rahwan, I. (2026) · Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems · doi:10.65109/czdc3237 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Instead, people act based on local heuristics, and cooperation emerges over time through normative values, punishment, and other social mechanisms [9].”
- Authors
- Henrich, J.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Henrich, Joseph
- ORCID
- Henrich, Joseph
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2006-04-07
- Volume
- 312
- Issue
- 5770
- Pages
- 60-61
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1547239602
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 40.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- evolution of cooperation, reputation, public goods game, spatial games, human institutions
- MeSH terms
- Cooperative Behavior, Cultural Evolution, Games, Experimental, Group Processes, Humans, Punishment, Social Behavior, Social Sciences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review