Cited by 233Evolutionary Game Theory and CooperationExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Cooperation, Punishment, and the Evolution of Human Institutions

Henrich, Joseph·2006·Science

Abstract

Reputation-based probabilistic punishment on the evolution of cooperation in the spatial public goods game,

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1126398

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henrich, J.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Henrich, Joseph
Venue
Science
Published
2006-04-07
Volume
312
Issue
5770
Pages
60-61
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1547239602
Cited by
233
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
FWCI
40.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
evolution of cooperation, reputation, public goods game, spatial games, human institutions
MeSH terms
Cooperative Behavior, Cultural Evolution, Games, Experimental, Group Processes, Humans, Punishment, Social Behavior, Social Sciences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review