The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Culture, Gender, and Math
Abstract
3,6293MetricsTotal Downloads3,629Last 6 Months491Last 12 Months1,041Total Citations3Last 6 Months0Last 12 Months0View all metrics
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The History and Geography of Human Genes: Abridged paperback Edition
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., Menozzi, P., & Piazza, A. (2018) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv301gjp · Cited by 3,175
Sex Differences in Mental Test Scores, Variability, and Numbers of High-Scoring Individuals
Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7604277 · Cited by 1,112
The Homecoming of American College Women: The Reversal of the College Gender Gap
Goldin, C., Katz, L. F., & Kuziemko, I. (2006) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.20.4.133 · Cited by 1,010
Kimura, D. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 935
Sex Differences in Mathematical Ability: Fact or Artifact?
Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1980) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7434028 · Cited by 889
Spolaore, E., & Wacziarg, R. (2009) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2009.124.2.469 · Cited by 793
Sex Differences in Intrinsic Aptitude for Mathematics and Science?: A Critical Review.
Spelke, E. S. (2005) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.9.950 · Cited by 751
Kimura, D. (1999) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6194.001.0001 · Cited by 494
The Essential Difference: Men, Women and the Extreme Male Brain
McClure, I. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7405.57 · Cited by 470
The Essential Difference: Men, Women and the Extreme Male Brain
Baron‐Cohen, S. (2007) · Cited by 445
Cited by
Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis.
Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0018053 · Cited by 1,630
The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2018) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797617741719 · Cited by 1,054
Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., Bar-Anan, Y., Bergh, R., Cai, H., Gonsalkorale, K., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0809921106 · Cited by 1,050
Women's underrepresentation in science: sociocultural and biological considerations
Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M., & Barnett, S. M. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0014412 · Cited by 957
New trends in gender and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis.
Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0021276 · Cited by 920
Metadata
- Authors
- Guiso, L., Monte, F., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2008-05-30
- Volume
- 320
- Issue
- 5880
- Pages
- 1164-1165
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2100217005
- Cited by
- 1,018
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 44.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Culture, Gender, and Math. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1154094
- The paper
- Guiso, L., Monte, F., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008). Culture, Gender, and Math. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1154094
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
