The Spread of Ras Activity Triggered by Activation of a Single Dendritic Spine
Open accessAbstract
In neurons, individual dendritic spines isolate N -methyl- d -aspartate (NMDA) receptor–mediated calcium ion (Ca 2+ ) accumulations from the dendrite and other spines. However, the extent to which spines compartmentalize signaling events downstream of Ca 2+ influx is not known. We combined two-photon fluorescence lifetime imaging with two-photon glutamate uncaging to image the activity of the small guanosine triphosphatase Ras after NMDA receptor activation at individual spines. Induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) triggered robust Ca 2+ -dependent Ras activation in single spines that decayed in ∼5 minutes. Ras activity spread over ∼10 micrometers of dendrite and invaded neighboring spines by diffusion. The spread of Ras-dependent signaling was necessary for the local regulation of the threshold for LTP induction. Thus, Ca 2+ -dependent synaptic signals can spread to couple multiple synapses on short stretches of dendrite.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ras activity was shown to invade typically 10-20 neighboring spines in a range of 10 μm along the dendrite, whereas RhoA activity only spread 5 μm and rarely invaded neighboring spines.
“Ras activity was shown to invade typically 10–20 neighboring spines in a range of 10 μm along the dendrite, whereas RhoA activity only spread 5 μm and rarely invaded neighboring spines (Harvey et al., 2008; Murakoshi et al., 2011).”
From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Harvey et al., 2008
The spatial-profile passage (p. 2) reports that Ras activity spread along the dendrite and invaded nearby spines, and the discussion (p. 4) describes a spread of about 10 μm. But the 10–20 synapses figure (p. 3) is an expectation for native Ras based on the authors’ analysis, not a directly observed typical count. The RhoA comparison is attributable to the other citation in the sentence, not to Harvey et al. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe activation of Ras measured by FRET-FLIM was dependent on CaMKII activation, peaked later, and recovered to baseline level only after 15 min.
“The activation of Ras measured by FRET-FLIM was dependent on CaMKII activation, peaked later, and recovered to baseline level only after 15 min.”
From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Harvey et al., 2008
The paper describes measuring Ras activation by FRET and fluorescence lifetime imaging (p. 1). It reports that a CaMKII inhibitor reduced Ras activation, which peaked within one minute of stimulation and returned to baseline within 15 minutes (p. 2). It does not establish that Ras peaked later than CaMKII, and “only after 15 min” overstates the reported return time. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredRas diffusion rate out of the spine was relatively fast, reaching the dendrite within seconds without leaving any immobile fraction in the spine.
“Its diffusion rate out of the spine was relatively fast, reaching the dendrite within seconds without leaving any immobile fraction in the spine (Harvey et al., 2008).”
From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Harvey et al., 2008
The mobility measurements (p. 2) show that Ras fluorescence decayed from the spine over seconds, and the discussion (p. 4) describes spine-to-dendrite diffusional coupling on a timescale of seconds. But the paper concludes only that there is no *major* immobile fraction: more than 90%, not all, of the measured fluorescence had left the spine after 30 seconds. It does not establish that there is no immobile fraction at all. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredRho-Rock and Ras-ERK signaling pathways lower the threshold for LTP in neighboring spines.
“In addition, Rho-Rock and Ras-ERK signaling pathways lower the threshold for LTP in neighboring spines (Zhu et al., 2002; Harvey and Svoboda, 2007; Harvey et al., 2008; Lee et al., 2009).”
From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Harvey et al., 2008
The crosstalk experiment (p. 3) reports that a MEK inhibitor blocking Ras-ERK signaling reduced sustained enlargement of a neighboring spine after a subthreshold stimulus. The authors conclude that spread of Ras-dependent signaling regulates the local LTP induction threshold (p. 4). These passages support the Ras-ERK part, but do not establish a role for Rho-Rock. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredBoth Ca2+ and Ras can regulate synaptic development and plasticity.
“Both Ca 2 þ and Ras can regulate synaptic development and plasticity (Tada and Sheng, 2006;Alvarez and Sabatini, 2007;Harvey et al, 2008).”
From Ral mediates activity‐dependent growth of postsynaptic membranes via recruitment of the exocyst (2013) · cites this paper as Harvey et al, 2008
The discussion on p. 2 links Ca2+ influx and Ras signaling to long-term potentiation, and the p. 3 synaptic-crosstalk experiment shows that Ras-dependent signaling is necessary for local plasticity. These passages support the plasticity part of the claim, but our copy does not establish that both regulate synaptic development. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paGFP-Rho GTPase decay time constants were ~10 times larger than that of cytosolic paGFP (~0.4 s) and similar to that of a constitutively active HRas mutant (~6 s).
“These values are ~10 times larger than the decay time constant of cytosolic paGFP (~0.4 s) and similar to that of a constitutively active HRas mutant (~6 s) (Fig. 3e–h)12.”
From Local, persistent activation of Rho GTPases during plasticity of single dendritic spines (2011) · cites this paper as [12]
The mobility results (p. 2) report that paGFP-Ras decayed more than ten times slower than cytosolic paGFP and that constitutively active Ras G12V diffused similarly to wild-type Ras. Figure 3B’s caption (p. 8) identifies the cytosolic and Ras G12V comparisons, but our copy does not give the cited numerical estimates of ~0.4 s and ~6 s. The Rho GTPase values appear to be the citing authors’ own results, not a finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe spine volume increased rapidly by ~300% following glutamate uncaging (transient phase) and relaxed to an elevated level of 70-80% for more than 30 min (sustained phase).
“The spine volume increased rapidly by ~300% following glutamate uncaging (transient phase) and relaxed to an elevated level of 70–80% for more than 30 min (sustained phase) (Figs. 1d, 2d)12–14.”
From Local, persistent activation of Rho GTPases during plasticity of single dendritic spines (2011) · cites this paper as [12]
The paper reports that glutamate uncaging caused sustained enlargement of the stimulated spine (p. 1). Its Figure 1 caption (p. 6) describes spine-volume measurements, but the text does not give a rapid ~300% increase or a sustained 70–80% increase for more than 30 minutes; it defines the sustained measurement at 15.5–19.5 minutes. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredInteractions between neighboring synapses do occur, such that intradendritic spread of activated Ras from an active synapse briefly lowers the threshold for subsequent LTP induction at neighboring synapses.
“However, interactions between neighboring synapses do occur, such that the intradendritic spread of the activated Ras from an active synapse briefly lowers the threshold for subsequent LTP induction at neighboring synapses (Harvey et al. 2008).”
From NMDA receptor-dependent long-term potentiation and long-term depression (LTP/LTD). (2012) · cites this paper as Harvey et al. 2008
This combination of techniques allowed recording activity patterns for CaMKII, Ras, RhoA and Cdc42 in dendritic spines following local glutamate uncaging.
“This combination of techniques allowed recording activity patterns for CaMKII (Lee et al., 2009), Ras (Harvey et al., 2008), RhoA and Cdc42 (Murakoshi et al., 2011) in dendritic spines following local glutamate uncaging.”
From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Harvey et al., 2008
The length constant of RhoA activity spread along the dendrite was 4.5 μm.
“The length constant of spread along the dendrite was 4.5 μm (Fig. 3a, b), a value similar to that for HRas (~10 μm)12.”
From Local, persistent activation of Rho GTPases during plasticity of single dendritic spines (2011) · cites this paper as [12]
The inactivation time constant is ~6 s for Cdc42 and ~30 s for RhoA, compared to 200-300 s for HRas.
“The short length constant of Cdc42 in the dendrites (1.9 μm, Fig. 3) also supports the fast inactivation of Cdc42 in the dendrite: the inactivation time constant τ is related to the length constant L and the diffusion constant D~0.6 μm2 (Ref 12) as τ = L2/D, and thus is ~6 s for Cdc42 and ~30 s for RhoA, compared to 200–300 s for HRas12.”
From Local, persistent activation of Rho GTPases during plasticity of single dendritic spines (2011) · cites this paper as [12]
HRas activity spreads from stimulated spines along dendrites and into surrounding spines over ~10 μm.
“In contrast, HRas activity spreads from the stimulated spines along dendrites and into surrounding spines over ~10 μm12.”
From Local, persistent activation of Rho GTPases during plasticity of single dendritic spines (2011) · cites this paper as [12]
The mechanism underlying this phenomenon involves local spreading of signaling cascades from the activated spine to its neighbors, and some of these spreading signals are potent drivers of F-actin dynamics.
“The mechanism underlying this phenomenon involves local spreading of signaling cascades from the activated spine to its neighbors, and some of these spreading signals are potent drivers of F-actin dynamics (24–26).”
From Synaptic evidence for the efficacy of spaced learning (2012) · cites this paper as [25]
Strong stimulation of single synapses causes the spread of active GTPases to neighboring spines.
“Prior work suggesting that strong stimulation of single synapses causes the spread of active GTPases to neighboring spines (24, 25) is of interest in this regard because these enzymes play critical roles in the production of stable LTP.”
From Synaptic evidence for the efficacy of spaced learning (2012) · cites this paper as [25]
These enzymes play critical roles in the production of stable LTP.
“because these enzymes play critical roles in the production of stable LTP.”
From Synaptic evidence for the efficacy of spaced learning (2012) · cites this paper as [25]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 434
Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- [1]1. Nimchinsky EA, Sabatini BL, Svoboda K. Annu. Rev. Physiol 2002;64:313. [PubMed: 11826272]
- [2]2. Svoboda K, Tank DW, Denk W. Science 1996;272:716. [PubMed: 8614831]
- [3]3. Bloodgood BL, Sabatini BL. Science 2005;310:866. [PubMed: 16272125]
- [4]4. Muller W, Connor JA. Nature 1991;354:73. [PubMed: 1682815]
- [5]5. Yuste R, Denk W. Nature 1995;375:682. [PubMed: 7791901]
- [6]6. Sabatini BL, Oertner TG, Svoboda K. Neuron 2002;33:439. [PubMed: 11832230]
- [7]7. Kennedy MB, Beale HC, Carlisle HJ, Washburn LR. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005;6:423. [PubMed: 15928715]
- [8]8. Kim MJ, Dunah AW, Wang YT, Sheng M. Neuron 2005;46:745. [PubMed: 15924861]
- [9]9. Tian X, et al. Embo J 2004;23:1567. [PubMed: 15029245]
- [10]10. Yun HY, Gonzalez-Zulueta M, Dawson VL, Dawson TM. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:5773. [PubMed: 9576960]
- [11]11. Zhu JJ, Qin Y, Zhao M, Van Aelst L, Malinow R. Cell 2002;110:443. [PubMed: 12202034] Science . Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 September 17.
- [12]12. Malenka RC, Bear MF. Neuron 2004;44:5. [PubMed: 15450156]
- [13]13. Matsuzaki M, Honkura N, Ellis-Davies GC, Kasai H. Nature 2004;429:761. [PubMed: 15190253]
- [14]14. Tsuriel S, et al. PLoS Biol 2006;4:e271. [PubMed: 16903782]
- [16]16. Harvey CD, Svoboda K. Nature 2007;450:1195. [PubMed: 18097401]
- [17]17. Yasuda R, et al. Nat Neurosci 2006;9:283. [PubMed: 16429133]
- [18]18. Mochizuki N, et al. Nature 2001;411:1065. [PubMed: 11429608]
- [19]19. Rocks O, et al. Science 2005;307(5716):1746. [PubMed: 15705808]
- [21]21. Gratton E, Breusegem S, Sutin J, Ruan Q, Barry N. J Biomed Opt 2003;8:381. [PubMed: 12880343]
- [23]23. Nimchinsky EA, Yasuda R, Oertner TG, Svoboda K. J Neurosci 2004;24:2054. [PubMed: 14985448]
- [24]24. Kopec CD, Li B, Wei W, Boehm J, Malinow R. J Neurosci 2006;26:2000. [PubMed: 16481433]
- [25]25. Fivaz M, Bandara S, Inoue T, Meyer T. Curr Biol 2008;18:44. [PubMed: 18158244]
- [26]26. Patterson GH, Lippincott-Schwartz J. Science 2002;297:1873. [PubMed: 12228718]
- [27]27. Reits EA, Neefjes JJ. Nat Cell Biol 2001;3:E145. [PubMed: 11389456]
- [28]28. Niv H, Gutman O, Kloog Y, Henis YI. J Cell Biol 2002;157:865. [PubMed: 12021258]
- [29]29. Lommerse PH, et al. Biophys J 2004;86:609. [PubMed: 14695305]
- [30]30. Losonczy A, Makara JK, Magee JC. Nature 2008;452:436. [PubMed: 18368112]
- Authors
- Harvey, C. D., Yasuda, R., Zhong, H., & Svoboda, K.
- Affiliations
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Harvey, Christopher D.
- Yasuda, Ryohei
- Svoboda, Karel
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2008-07-04
- Volume
- 321
- Issue
- 5885
- Pages
- 136-140
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- PMC
- PMC2745709
- OpenAlex
- W1990107671
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 35
- FWCI
- 13.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Autism Speaks (AS1398)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH080047)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- Ras activity, dendritic spines, NMDA receptor, calcium signaling, long-term potentiation, glutamate uncaging, fluorescence lifetime imaging, synaptic plasticity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Calcium, Cell Membrane, Diffusion, Hippocampus, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Synapses, Transfection, Signal Transduction, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Long-Term Potentiation, Pyramidal Cells, ras Proteins, Glutamic Acid, Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors, GTPase-Activating Proteins, Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer, Dendritic Spines, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review