Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 346

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Transposon-Based Genetic Screen in Mice Identifies Genes Altered in Colorectal Cancer

Open access
Starr, Timothy K., Allaei, Raha, Silverstein, Kevin A. T., Staggs, Rodney A., Sarver, Aaron L., Bergemann, Tracy L., Gupta, Mihir, O'Sullivan, M. Gerard, Matise, Ilze, Dupuy, Adam J., Collier, Lara S., Powers, Scott, Oberg, Ann L., Asmann, Yan W., Thibodeau, Stephen N., Tessarollo, Lino, Copeland, Neal G., Jenkins, Nancy A., Cormier, Robert T., Largaespada, David A.·2009·Science

Abstract

Human colorectal cancers (CRCs) display a large number of genetic and epigenetic alterations, some of which are causally involved in tumorigenesis (drivers) and others that have little functional impact (passengers). To help distinguish between these two classes of alterations, we used a transposon-based genetic screen in mice to identify candidate genes for CRC. Mice harboring mutagenic Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposons were crossed with mice expressing SB transposase in gastrointestinal tract epithelium. Most of the offspring developed intestinal lesions, including intraepithelial neoplasia, adenomas, and adenocarcinomas. Analysis of over 16,000 transposon insertions identified 77 candidate CRC genes, 60 of which are mutated and/or dysregulated in human CRC and thus are most likely to drive tumorigenesis. These genes include APC, PTEN , and SMAD4 . The screen also identified 17 candidate genes that had not previously been implicated in CRC, including POLI, PTPRK , and RSPO2 .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1163040

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 346

Metadata

Authors
Starr, T. K., Allaei, R., Silverstein, K. A. T., Staggs, R. A., Sarver, A. L., Bergemann, T. L., Gupta, M., O'Sullivan, M. G., Matise, I., Dupuy, A. J., Collier, L. S., Powers, S., Oberg, A. L., Asmann, Y. W., Thibodeau, S. N., Tessarollo, L., Copeland, N. G., Jenkins, N. A., Cormier, R. T., & Largaespada, D. A.
Venue
Science
Published
2009-03-27
Volume
323
Issue
5922
Pages
1747-1750
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2065833903
Cited by
346
References
3
FWCI
24.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Transposon-Based Genetic Screen in Mice Identifies Genes Altered in Colorectal Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1163040
The paper
Starr, T. K., Allaei, R., Silverstein, K. A. T., Staggs, R. A., Sarver, A. L., Bergemann, T. L., Gupta, M., O'Sullivan, M. G., Matise, I., Dupuy, A. J., Collier, L. S., Powers, S., Oberg, A. L., Asmann, Y. W., Thibodeau, S. N., Tessarollo, L., Copeland, N. G., Jenkins, N. A., Cormier, R. T., & Largaespada, D. A. (2009). A Transposon-Based Genetic Screen in Mice Identifies Genes Altered in Colorectal Cancer. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1163040

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.