Cited by 79

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Entanglement Filter

Okamoto, Ryo, O'Brien, Jeremy L., Hofmann, Holger F., Nagata, Tomohisa, Sasaki, Keiji, Takeuchi, Shigeki·2009·Science

Abstract

The ability to filter quantum states is a key capability in quantum information science and technology, in which one-qubit filters, or polarizers, have found wide application. Filtering on the basis of entanglement requires extension to multi-qubit filters with qubit-qubit interactions. We demonstrated an optical entanglement filter that passes a pair of photons if they have the desired correlations of their polarization. Such devices have many important applications to quantum technologies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1167182

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. M. A. Nielsen I. L. Chuang Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge Univ. Press Cambridge UK 2000).
  2. 10.1126/science.1104149 · DOI
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2733 · DOI
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.147901 · DOI
  5. 10.1126/science.1138007 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.210505 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.210506 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1038/nphoton.2007.22 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.013602 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/35074041 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/nature01358 · DOI
  12. 10.1063/1.523304 · DOI
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4725 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.021801 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.083601 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.203602 · DOI
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.062311 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1063/1.123482 · DOI
  19. 10.1063/1.123404 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1038/nphoton.2007.173 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/nphoton.2008.101 · DOI
  22. 10.1126/science.1155441 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Okamoto, R., O'Brien, J. L., Hofmann, H. F., Nagata, T., Sasaki, K., & Takeuchi, S.
Affiliations
Research Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan.
Venue
Science
Published
2009-01-23
Volume
323
Issue
5913
Pages
483-485
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
Cited by
79
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review