Cited by 575Planetary Science and ExplorationAstro and Planetary ScienceGeology and Paleoclimatology Research

H 2 O at the Phoenix Landing Site

Open access
Smith, P. H., Tamppari, L. K., Arvidson, R. E., Bass, D., Blaney, D., Boynton, W. V., Carswell, A., Catling, D. C. +28 more·2009·Science

Abstract

Phoenix Ascending: The Phoenix mission landed on Mars in March 2008 with the goal of studying the ice-rich soil of the planet's northern arctic region. Phoenix included a robotic arm, with a camera attached to it, with the capacity to excavate through the soil to the ice layer beneath it, scoop up soil and water ice samples, and deliver them to a combination of other instruments—including a wet chemistry lab and a high-temperature oven combined with a mass spectrometer—for chemical and geological analysis. Using this setup, Smith et al. (p. 58 ) found a layer of ice at depths of 5 to 15 centimeters, Boynton et al. (p. 61 ) found evidence for the presence of calcium carbonate in the soil, and Hecht et al. (p. 64 ) found that most of the soluble chlorine at the surface is in the form of perchlorate. Together these results suggest that the soil at the Phoenix landing site must have suffered alteration through the action of liquid water in geologically the recent past. The analysis revealed an alkaline environment, in contrast to that found by the Mars Exploration Rovers, indicating that many different environments have existed on Mars. Phoenix also carried a lidar, an instrument that sends laser light upward into the atmosphere and detects the light scattered back by clouds and dust. An analysis of the data by Whiteway et al. (p. 68 ) showed that clouds of ice crystals that precipitated back to the surface formed on a daily basis, providing a mechanism to place ice at the surface.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1172339

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The TEGA instrument did not detect low temperature water release in soil samples at the Phoenix landing site, but did detect a minor H2O release starting at 295 °C and a major release starting at 735 °C.

    “The TEGA instrument did not a detect low temperature water release in soil samples at the Phoenix landing site (Smith et al., 2009), but did detect a minor H2O release starting at 295 °C and a major release starting at 735 °C.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, P. H., Tamppari, L. K., Arvidson, R. E., Bass, D., Blaney, D., Boynton, W. V., Carswell, A., Catling, D. C., Clark, B. C., Duck, T., DeJong, E., Fisher, D., Goetz, W., Gunnlaugsson, H. P., Hecht, M. H., Hipkin, V., Hoffman, J., Hviid, S. F., Keller, H. U., Kounaves, S. P., Lange, C. F., Lemmon, M. T., Madsen, M. B., Markiewicz, W. J., Marshall, J., McKay, C. P., Mellon, M. T., Ming, D. W., Morris, R. V., Pike, W. T., Renno, N., Staufer, U., Stoker, C., Taylor, P., Whiteway, J. A., & Zent, A. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Optech (Canada) (CA)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Space Science Institute (US)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • Geological Survey of Canada (CA)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Canadian Space Agency (CA)
  • The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (US)
  • Ames Research Center (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Johnson Space Center (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
  • University of Neuchâtel (CH)
  • York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Smith, P. H.
Venue
Science
Published
2009-07-03
Volume
325
Issue
5936
Pages
58-61
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2152693230
Cited by
575
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 56
FWCI
27.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Science and Technology Facilities Council (PP/D002354/1, ST/G008485/1, PP/D002192/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Keywords
Phoenix lander, Mars, water ice, subsurface ice, Martian soil, calcium carbonate, perchlorate, aqueous alteration, alkaline conditions, ice clouds, Mars atmosphere
MeSH terms
Calcium Carbonate, Extraterrestrial Environment, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Ice, Robotics, Temperature, Water, Spacecraft, Mars

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review