Cited by 146Planetary Science and ExplorationSpace Exploration and TechnologyCatalysts for Methane Reforming

Mars Oxygen ISRU Experiment (MOXIE)

Open access
Hecht, M., Hoffman, J., Rapp, D., McClean, J., SooHoo, J., Schaefer, R., Aboobaker, A., Mellstrom, J. +37 more·2021·Space Science Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11214-020-00782-8

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MOXIE has produced oxygen seven times during 2021 via solid oxide electrolysis of carbon dioxide in the Martian atmosphere.

    “By producing oxygen through solid oxide electrolysis of carbon dioxide in the Martian atmosphere, MOXIE has produced oxygen seven times during 2021 and will continue to demonstrate day and night oxygen production in all seasons of Mars.”
  • The solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC) component of MOXIE works at 800°C and demonstrated production of 6 g of O2 from compressed Martian ambient using a full energy of about 1 kWh.

    “The solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC) component of MOXIE works at 800°C, which demonstrated the production of 6 g of O2 from compressed Martian ambient by using a full energy of about 1 kWh. 129”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hecht, M., Hoffman, J., Rapp, D., McClean, J., SooHoo, J., Schaefer, R., Aboobaker, A., Mellstrom, J., Hartvigsen, J., Meyen, F., Hinterman, E., Voecks, G., Liu, A., Nasr, M., Lewis, J., Johnson, J., Guernsey, C., Swoboda, J., Eckert, C., Alcalde, C., Poirier, M., Khopkar, P., Elangovan, S., Madsen, M., Smith, P., Graves, C., Sanders, G., Araghi, K., de la Torre Juarez, M., Larsen, D., Agui, J., Burns, A., Lackner, K., Nielsen, R., Pike, T., Tata, B., Wilson, K., Brown, T., Disarro, T., Morris, R., Schaefer, R., Steinkraus, R., Surampudi, R., Werne, T., & Ponce, A.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Draper Laboratory (US)
  • MathWorks (United States) (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Technical University of Denmark (DK)
  • Johnson Space Center (US)
  • Glenn Research Center (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hoffman, J.
Venue
Space Science Reviews
Published
2021-01-06
Volume
217
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0038-6308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9672
OpenAlex
W3118846047
Cited by
142
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 14 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
12.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Space Science Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNH17CH01C, 80NM0018D0004)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Keywords
MOXIE, in-situ resource utilization, Mars 2020 Perseverance rover, CO2 dissociation, oxygen production, Mars atmosphere, technology demonstration, human Mars exploration, oxygen purity, operational durability, dust storms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review