Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,796

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhancement of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by Ecological Restoration: A Meta-Analysis

Benayas, José M. Rey, Newton, Adrian C., Diaz, Anita, Bullock, James M.·2009·Science

Abstract

Assessing Ecological Restoration: In the wake of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, the analysis of ecosystem services, and their relationship to biodiversity, has become one of the most rapidly developing research themes in environmental science. At the same time, ecological restoration is widely being implemented as a response to environmental degradation and biodiversity loss. Rey Benayas et al. (p. 1121 , published online 30 July) link these themes in a meta-analysis of the impacts of ecological restoration actions on provision of ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation. The analysis of 89 published restoration projects worldwide establishes that ecological restoration does, in general, have positive impacts on both biodiversity and provision of ecosystem services. These effects are especially marked in the tropics. Thus, ecological restoration actions may indeed deliver benefits, both in terms of biodiversity conservation and supporting human livelihoods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1172460

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. A. F. Clewell J. Aronson Ecological Restoration: Principles Values and Structure of an Emerging Profession (Island Press Washington DC 2007).
  2. W. Jordan M. Gilpin J. Aber Eds. Restoration Ecology: A Synthetic Approach to Ecological Research (Cambridge Univ. Press Cambridge 1987).
  3. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis (Island Press Washington DC 2005).
  4. 10.1126/science.1155365 · DOI · Paper page
  5. J. Aronson S. J. Milton J. Blignaut Eds. Restoring Natural Capital: Science Business and Practice (Island Press Washington DC 2007).
  6. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040379 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1073/pnas.0804960105 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1073/pnas.0707823105 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1890/070057 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01492.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. J. Gurevitch L. V. Hedges in Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments S. M. Scheiner J. Gurevitch Eds. (Oxford Univ. Press Oxford 2001) p. 347. · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2008.00031.x · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00332.x · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1126/science.1097920 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01252.x · DOI
  16. 10.1073/pnas.0705503104 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1641/B580909 · DOI
  18. 10.1126/science.1073947 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,796

Metadata

Authors
Benayas, J. M. R., Newton, A. C., Diaz, A., & Bullock, J. M.
Venue
Science
Published
2009-08-28
Volume
325
Issue
5944
Pages
1121-1124
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2068464578
Cited by
1,796
References
4
FWCI
9.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhancement of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by Ecological Restoration: A Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1172460
The paper
Benayas, J. M. R., Newton, A. C., Diaz, A., & Bullock, J. M. (2009). Enhancement of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by Ecological Restoration: A Meta-Analysis. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172460

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.