Cited by 332CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Creating Bacterial Strains from Genomes That Have Been Cloned and Engineered in Yeast

Lartigue, Carole, Vashee, Sanjay, Algire, Mikkel A., Chuang, Ray-Yuan, Benders, Gwynedd A., Ma, Li, Noskov, Vladimir N., Denisova, Evgeniya A. +9 more·2009·Science

Abstract

Character Transplant: When engineering bacteria, it can be advantageous to propagate the genomes in yeast. However, to be truly useful, one must be able to transplant the bacterial chromosome from yeast back into a recipient bacterial cell. But because yeast does not contain restriction-modification systems, such transplantation poses problems not encountered in transplantation from one bacterial cell to another. Bacterial genomes isolated after growth in yeast are likely to be susceptible to the restriction-modification system(s) of the recipient cell, as well as their own. Lartigue et al. (p. 1693 , published online 20 August) describe multiple steps, including in vitro DNA methylation, developed to overcome such barriers. A Mycoplasma mycoides large-colony genome was propagated in yeast as a centromeric plasmid, engineered via yeast genetic systems, and, after specific methylation, transplanted into M. capricolum to produce a bacterial cell with the genotype and phenotype of the altered M. mycoides large-colony genome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1173759

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genome manipulation in yeast and transplantation do not induce mutations.

    “Genome manipulation in yeast and transplantation do not induce mutations as shown by sequencing before and after transplantation (Lartigue et al., 2009)”

    From Genetic requirements for cell division in a genomically minimal cell (2020) · cites this paper as Lartigue et al., 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lartigue, C., Vashee, S., Algire, M. A., Chuang, R.-Y., Benders, G. A., Ma, L., Noskov, V. N., Denisova, E. A., Gibson, D. G., Assad-Garcia, N., Alperovich, N., Thomas, D. W., Merryman, C., Hutchison, C. A., Smith, H. O., Venter, J. C., & Glass, J. I.
Affiliations
J. Craig Venter Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Vashee, Sanjay
  • Thomas, David W.
Venue
Science
Published
2009-09-25
Volume
325
Issue
5948
Pages
1693-1696
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2134370272
Cited by
332
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 21
FWCI
15.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
Mycoplasma mycoides, Mycoplasma capricolum, restriction-modification systems, DNA methylation, centromeric plasmids, bacterial genome engineering
MeSH terms
Centromere, Cloning, Molecular, DNA Restriction Enzymes, Genetic Engineering, Mycoplasma mycoides, Plasmids, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Transformation, Bacterial, Deoxyribonucleases, Type III Site-Specific, Genome, Bacterial, Sequence Deletion, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Gene Transfer Techniques, DNA Methylation, Mycoplasma capricolum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review