The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genome-Wide Evolutionary Analysis of Eukaryotic DNA Methylation
Abstract
Epigenetic Maps: Methylation of genomic DNA on cytosine bases provides critical epigenetic regulation of gene expression and is involved in silencing transposable elements (TEs) and repeated sequences, as well as regulating imprinted gene expression. Zemach et al. (p. 916 , published online 15 April; see the Perspective by Jeltsch ) analyzed DNA methylation in the genomes of five plants, five fungi, and seven animals by bisulfite sequencing. The data suggest that land plants and vertebrates, which have extensive DNA methylation, are under strong selective pressure to repress TEs, because of their sexual mode of reproduction. Unicellular animals and fungi that reproduce asexually are more likely to lose TE methylation. Although gene body methylation is evolutionarily ancient, it is also mutagenic, and so loss of this pathway has been relatively common and occurred early in fungal evolution and later in several plant and animal lineages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences
Lister, R., Pelizzola, M., Dowen, R. H., Hawkins, R. D., Hon, G., Tonti-Filippini, J., Nery, J. R., Lee, L., Ye, Z., Ngo, Q.-M., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08514 · Cited by 4,673
DNA methylation landscapes: Provocative insights from epigenomics
Suzuki, M. M., & Bird, A. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2341 · Cited by 3,039
Jaillon, O., Aury, J.-M., Brunet, F., Petit, J.-L., Stange-Thomann, N., Mauceli, E., Bouneau, L., Fischer, C., Ozouf-Costaz, C., Bernot, A., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03025 · Cited by 1,966
Conservation and divergence of methylation patterning in plants and animals
Feng, S., Cokus, S. J., Zhang, X., Chen, P.-Y., Bostick, M., Goll, M. G., Hetzel, J., Jain, J., Strauss, S. H., Halpern, M. E., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1002720107 · Cited by 1,285
Histone H2A.Z and DNA methylation are mutually antagonistic chromatin marks
Zilberman, D., Coleman-Derr, D., Ballinger, T., & Henikoff, S. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07324 · Cited by 593
Self-citation
Cited by
The Polycomb complex PRC2 and its mark in life
Margueron, R., & Reinberg, D. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09784 · Cited by 3,347
Function and information content of DNA methylation
Schübeler, D. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14192 · Cited by 2,060
Conservation and divergence of methylation patterning in plants and animals
Feng, S., Cokus, S. J., Zhang, X., Chen, P.-Y., Bostick, M., Goll, M. G., Hetzel, J., Jain, J., Strauss, S. H., Halpern, M. E., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1002720107 · Cited by 1,285
Gene Body Methylation Can Alter Gene Expression and Is a Therapeutic Target in Cancer
Yang, X., Han, H., De Carvalho, D. D., Lay, F. D., Jones, P. A., & Liang, G. (2014) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2014.07.028 · Cited by 1,199
Koh, K. P., Yabuuchi, A., Rao, S., Huang, Y., Cunniff, K., Nardone, J., Laiho, A., Tahiliani, M., Sommer, C. A., Mostoslavsky, G., et al. (2011) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2011.01.008 · Cited by 776
Metadata
- Authors
- Zemach, A., McDaniel, I. E., Silva, P., & Zilberman, D.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2010-05-14
- Volume
- 328
- Issue
- 5980
- Pages
- 916-919
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2024848067
- Cited by
- 1,793
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 41.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome-Wide Evolutionary Analysis of Eukaryotic DNA Methylation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1186366
- The paper
- Zemach, A., McDaniel, I. E., Silva, P., & Zilberman, D. (2010). Genome-Wide Evolutionary Analysis of Eukaryotic DNA Methylation. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1186366
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
