CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 150Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMotor Control and AdaptationFree Will and Agency

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitive Illusions of Authorship Reveal Hierarchical Error Detection in Skilled Typists

Logan, Gordon D., Crump, Matthew J. C.·2010·Science
DOI 10.1126/science.1190483
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Touchy Typing: Even the most able typist makes errors, and Logan and Crump (p. 683 ) have used this real-world task to probe for the existence of two error-detection mechanisms. They inserted errors into words that had been typed correctly by the subjects, and they corrected errors that had been made. By measuring implicit error detection as the slowing of movement just after an error had been committed and by eliciting explicit monitoring of errors by the output shown on the screen, they uncovered a double dissociation. Inserted errors did not lengthen the interval until the next letter was typed, but they were reported by the typist as errors; on the other hand, corrected errors did increase the interval, but were nevertheless claimed by the subjects as having been typed correctly.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1190483

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. K. S. Lashley in Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior L. A. Jeffress Ed. (Wiley New York 1951) pp. 112–136.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 150

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Logan, G. D., & Crump, M. J. C.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Logan, Gordon D.
ORCID
Venue
Science
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Published
2010-10-29
Volume
330
Issue
6004
Pages
683-686
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
DOI
10.1126/science.1190483
OpenAlex
W1997480456
Cited by
150
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 15
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
error detection, cognitive control, typists, two-process theory, self-attribution, blame attribution
MeSH terms
Cognition, Feedback, Humans, Illusions, Psychomotor Performance, Task Performance and Analysis, Writing, Computer Peripherals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review