Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From the Connectome to the Synaptome: An Epic Love Story

DeFelipe, Javier·2010·Science

Abstract

Connections by Degree: A recent explosion of data and of large projects dealing with the problem of connectivity in the human brain has not yet led to clear strategies to study connectomes. DeFelipe (p. 1198 ) reviews the intellectual history of the field, from the 19th-century studies of the seminal anatomist Ramon y Cajal to the very recent approaches and myriad new technologies applied by many laboratories trying to understand the organization of the human cerebral cortex.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1193378

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 167

Metadata

Authors
DeFelipe, J.
Venue
Science
Published
2010-11-26
Volume
330
Issue
6008
Pages
1198-1201
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1971353156
Cited by
167
References
3
FWCI
9.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From the Connectome to the Synaptome: An Epic Love Story. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1193378
The paper
DeFelipe, J. (2010). From the Connectome to the Synaptome: An Epic Love Story. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1193378

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.