Cited by 371Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesComplex Network Analysis TechniquesAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

A tutorial in connectome analysis: Topological and spatial features of brain networks

Open access
Kaiser, Marcus·2011·NeuroImage

Abstract

High-throughput methods for yielding the set of connections in a neural system, the connectome, are now being developed. This tutorial describes ways to analyze the topological and spatial organizations of the connectome at the macroscopic level of connectivity between brain regions as well as the microscopic level of connectivity between neurons. We will describe topological features at three different levels: the local scale of individual nodes, the regional scale of sets of nodes, and the global scale of the complete set of nodes in a network. Such features can be used to characterize components of a network and to compare different networks, e.g. the connectome of patients and control subjects for clinical studies. At the global scale, different types of networks can be distinguished and we will describe Erdös-Rényi random, scale-free, small-world, modular, and hierarchical archetypes of networks. Finally, the connectome also has a spatial organization and we describe methods for analyzing wiring lengths of neural systems. As an introduction for new researchers in the field of connectome analysis, we discuss the benefits and limitations of each analysis approach.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.025

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaiser, M.
Affiliations
Seoul National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kaiser, Marcus
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-08
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
892-907
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985932255
Cited by
371
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 19
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/E002331/1, EP/G03950X/1)
  • Royal Society (RG/2006/R2)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (R32-10142)
  • Western Carolina University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
brain network topology, interregional connectivity, neuronal connectivity, network modules, small-world networks, scale-free networks, Erdős-Rényi random graphs, hierarchical networks, wire length, network comparison
MeSH terms
Brain, Humans, Models, Neurological, Neural Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review