Cited by 686Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain functionMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Microstructure of the neocortex: comparative aspects

DeFelipe, Javier, Alonso-Nanclares, Lidia, Arellano, Jon I.·2002·Journal of Neurocytology

Abstract

The appearance of the neocortex, its expansion, and its differentiation in mammals, represents one of the principal episodes in the evolution of the vertebrate brain. One of the fundamental questions in neuroscience is what is special about the neocortex of humans and how does it differ from that of other species? It is clear that distinct cortical areas show important differences within both the same and different species, and this has led to some researchers emphasizing the similarities whereas others focus on the differences. In general, despite of the large number of different elements that contribute to neocortical circuits, it is thought that neocortical neurons are organized into multiple, small repeating microcircuits, based around pyramidal cells and their input-output connections. These inputs originate from extrinsic afferent systems, excitatory glutamatergic spiny cells (which include other pyramidal cells and spiny stellate cells), and inhibitory GABAergic interneurons. The problem is that the neuronal elements that make up the basic microcircuit are differentiated into subtypes, some of which are lacking or highly modified in different cortical areas or species. Furthermore, the number of neurons contained in a discrete vertical cylinder of cortical tissue varies across species. Additionally, it has been shown that the neuropil in different cortical areas of the human, rat and mouse has a characteristic layer specific synaptology. These variations most likely re…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1024130211265

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeFelipe, J., Alonso-Nanclares, L., & Arellano, J. I.
Affiliations
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
Corresponding author
DeFelipe, Javier
Venue
Journal of Neurocytology
Published
2002-03
Volume
31
Issue
3-5
Pages
299-316
ISSN
  • 0300-4864 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7381
OpenAlex
W1599549671
Cited by
686
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 20
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurocytology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
neocortex, cortical microcircuits, pyramidal neurons, GABAergic interneurons, synaptology, cortical laminar organization, neuronal cell types
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Count, Biological Evolution, Humans, Microscopy, Electron, Species Specificity, Synapses, Neocortex, Neuropil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review