The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Determinants of Scouting Behavior in Honey Bees
Abstract
Bee Adventurous: Individuals differ in their behavior, sometimes in consistent ways. For example, some people may seek out new experiences, while others prefer to stick with what they know. This is true in bees as well, where some workers take on the dangerous, novelty-seeking task of scouting more often than others. Liang et al. (p. 1225 ) found that bees that display such scouting behavior not only tend to scout in multiple contexts (both foraging and searching for nests) but also show differences in gene expression in their brains. Experimental manipulation of gene expression predictably changed scouting behavior. The molecular underpinnings of bee scouting behavior appear to be similar to those associated with novelty-seeking in vertebrate species, including humans.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Gene expression profiles in specific brain regions or even whole brains have proven useful as surrogates for behavioral states (Fig. 1A); in some cases, the correspondence between brain gene expression profile and behavior is strong enough to use the former to predict the latter (7, 27).”
From Behavior-related gene regulatory networks: A new level of organization in the brain (2020) · cites this paper as [27]
Citations
Cites
Ebstein, R. P., Novick, O., Umansky, R., Priel, B., Osher, Y., Blaine, D., Bennett, E. R., Nemanov, L., Katz, M., & Belmaker, R. H. (1996) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0196-78 · Cited by 1,475
Benjamin, J., Li, L., Patterson, C., Greenberg, B. D., Murphy, D. L., & Hamer, D. H. (1996) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0196-81 · Cited by 1,194
Psychobiology of novelty seeking and drug seeking behavior
Bardo, M. T., Donohew, R. L., & Harrington, N. G. (1996) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0166-4328(95)00203-0 · Cited by 667
Ein Beitrag zur Frage der Arbeitsteilung im Bienenstaat
Lindauer, M. (1952) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/bf00298048 · Cited by 475
Evans, P. D., & Maqueira, B. (2005) · Invertebrate Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s10158-005-0001-z · Cited by 294
Drd4 gene polymorphisms are associated with personality variation in a passerine bird
Fidler, A. E., van Oers, K., Drent, P. J., Kuhn, S., Mueller, J. C., & Kempenaers, B. (2007) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0337 · Cited by 216
Catecholamine receptor polymorphisms affect decision-making in C. elegans
Bendesky, A., Tsunozaki, M., Rockman, M. V., Kruglyak, L., & Bargmann, C. I. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09821 · Cited by 204
Division of labor between scouts and recruits in honeybee foraging
Seeley, T. D. (1983) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/bf00290778 · Cited by 168
Self-citationGlutamate-like immunoreactivity in identified neuronal populations of insect nervous systems
Bicker, G., Schäfer, S., Ottersen, O. P., & Storm‐Mathisen, J. (1988) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.08-06-02108.1988 · Cited by 163
Mustard, J. A., Blenau, W., Hamilton, I. S., Ward, V. K., Ebert, P. R., & Mercer, A. R. (2003) · Molecular Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0169-328x(03)00091-3 · Cited by 97
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- T. D. Seeley Honey Bee Democracy (Princeton Univ. Press Princeton NJ 2010).
Cited by
Epigenetic (re)programming of caste-specific behavior in the ant Camponotus floridanus
Simola, D. F., Graham, R. J., Brady, C. M., Enzmann, B. L., Desplan, C., Ray, A., Zwiebel, L. J., Bonasio, R., Reinberg, D., Liebig, J., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aac6633 · Cited by 242
Behavior-related gene regulatory networks: A new level of organization in the brain
Sinha, S., Jones, B. M., Traniello, I. M., Bukhari, S. A., Halfon, M. S., Hofmann, H. A., Huang, S., Katz, P. S., Keagy, J., Lynch, V. J., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1921625117 · Cited by 85
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Liang, Z. S., Nguyen, T., Mattila, H. R., Rodriguez-Zas, S. L., Seeley, T. D., & Robinson, G. E.
- Affiliations
- Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
- Institute of Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
- Department of Biological Sciences, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA, USA.
- Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2012-03-09
- Volume
- 335
- Issue
- 6073
- Pages
- 1225-1228
- ISSN
- 0036-8075
- 1095-9203
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 17
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
