Cited by 112Viral Infections and Immunology ResearchVaccine Coverage and HesitancyVirology and Viral Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficacy of inactivated poliovirus vaccine in India

Open access
Jafari, Hamid, Deshpande, Jagadish M., Sutter, Roland W., Bahl, Sunil, Verma, Harish, Ahmad, Mohammad, Kunwar, Abhishek, Vishwakarma, Rakesh, Agarwal, Ashutosh, Jain, Shilpi, Estivariz, Concepcion, Sethi, Raman, Molodecky, Natalie A., Grassly, Nicholas C., Pallansch, Mark A., Chatterjee, Arani, Aylward, R. Bruce·2014·Science

Abstract

Two vaccines together are better than one alone: Polio is proving difficult to eradicate. Making the choice between administering a live attenuated vaccine orally (Sabin) or an inactivated vaccine (Salk) by injection has been highly controversial. Patients prefer the Sabin vaccine, but it requires many doses to offer immunity. Jafari et al. tested the two vaccines together in northern India. The injected vaccine significantly reduced virus shedding and boosted intestinal mucosal immunity in children already given the oral vaccine. Thus, using both vaccines could help speed the eventual global demise of polio. Science , this issue p. 922

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1255006

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In children previously vaccinated with OPV, administration of IPV significantly reduced the proportion of subjects who shed virus after a first dose of OPV.

    “The results showed that in children who had previously been vaccinated with OPV, the administration of IPV significantly reduced the proportion of subjects who shed virus after a first dose of OPV [75,76].”

    From The Fight against Poliovirus Is Not Over (2023) · cites this paper as [76]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. R. W. Sutter et al . in Vaccines S. A. Plotkin W. A. Orenstein Eds. (Saunders Philadelphia PA ed. 6 2012) vol. 28 p. 598.
  2. J. R. Paul History of Poliomyelitis (Yale Univ. Press Princeton NJ 1978.
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 50, 222–224 (2001).
  4. World Health Organization, Wkly. Epidemiol. Rec. 88, 1–6 (2013).
  5. SAS/STAT user’s guide version 6.4. 4 th ed. Vol.1. Cary NC: SAS Institute 1989.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jafari, H., Deshpande, J. M., Sutter, R. W., Bahl, S., Verma, H., Ahmad, M., Kunwar, A., Vishwakarma, R., Agarwal, A., Jain, S., Estivariz, C., Sethi, R., Molodecky, N. A., Grassly, N. C., Pallansch, M. A., Chatterjee, A., & Aylward, R. B.
Affiliations
  • World Health Organization - India (IN)
  • Haffkine Institute (IN)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • World Health Organization, India-National Polio Surveillance Project, R. K. Khanna Stadium, Africa Avenue, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, India.
  • Panacea Biotec (India) (IN)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Sutter, Roland W.
Venue
Science
Published
2014-08-22
Volume
345
Issue
6199
Pages
922-925
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1989164437
Cited by
112
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 3
FWCI
13.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • Indian Council of Medical Research
  • Ministry of Health and Family Welfare
  • National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K010174/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Immunology Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
Keywords
inactivated poliovirus vaccine, oral polio vaccine, mucosal immunity, fecal shedding, paralytic poliomyelitis, vaccine efficacy, intestinal immunity
MeSH terms
Adult, Antibodies, Viral, Child, Child, Preschool, Feces, Female, Humans, Immunization, Secondary, India, Infant, Intestinal Mucosa, Male, Middle Aged, Poliomyelitis, Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated, Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral, Prevalence, Virus Shedding, Poliovirus, Immunity, Mucosal, Disease Eradication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review