The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Teaching Machines: From the experimental study of learning come devices which arrange optimal conditions for self-instruction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Skinner, B. F. (1957) · doi:10.1037/11256-000 · Cited by 5,759
Self-citation
Cited by
State of the art and practice in AI in education
Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12533 · Cited by 1,093
Artificial Intelligence in Education: The Three Paradigms
Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020 · Cited by 991
Effectiveness of Intelligent Tutoring Systems: A Meta-Analytic Review
Kulik, J. A., & Fletcher, J. D. (2016) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654315581420 · Cited by 930
Bhutoria, A. (2022) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100068 · Cited by 677
Kim, J., Lee, H., & Cho, Y. H. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10831-6 · Cited by 669
Metadata
- Authors
- Skinner, B. F.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1958-10-24
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 3330
- Pages
- 969-977
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2083857559
- Cited by
- 753
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 166.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Teaching Machines: From the experimental study of learning come devices which arrange optimal conditions for self-instruction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.128.3330.969
- The paper
- Skinner, B. F. (1958). Teaching Machines: From the experimental study of learning come devices which arrange optimal conditions for self-instruction. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.128.3330.969
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
