The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Emerging Principles for the Recognition of Peptide Antigens by MHC Class I Molecules
Abstract
Class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules interact with self and foreign peptides of diverse amino acid sequences yet exhibit distinct allele-specific selectivity for peptide binding. The structures of the peptide-binding specificity pockets (subsites) in the groove of murine H-2K b as well as human histocompatibility antigen class I molecules have been analyzed. Deep but highly conserved pockets at each end of the groove bind the amino and carboxyl termini of peptide through extensive hydrogen bonding and, hence, dictate the orientation of peptide binding. A deep polymorphic pocket in the middle of the groove provides the chemical and structural complementarity for one of the peptide's anchor residues, thereby playing a major role in allele-specific peptide binding. Although one or two shallow pockets in the groove may also interact with specific peptide side chains, their role in the selection of peptide is minor. Thus, usage of a limited number of both deep and shallow pockets in multiple combinations appears to allow the binding of a broad range of peptides. This binding occurs with high affinity, primarily because of extensive interactions with the peptide backbone and the conserved hydrogen bonding network at both termini of the peptide. Interactions between the anchor residue (or residues) and the corresponding allele-specific pocket provide sufficient extra binding affinity not only to enhance specificity but also to endure the presentation of the peptide at the cell surface for recognition by T cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bjorkman, P. J., Saper, M. A., Samraoui, B., Bennett, W. S., Strominger, J. L., & Wiley, D. C. (1987) · Nature · doi:10.1038/329512a0 · Cited by 2,377
STRUCTURE, FUNCTION, AND DIVERSITY OF CLASS I MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX MOLECULES
Bjorkman, P. J., & Parham, P. (1990) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.59.070190.001345 · Cited by 700
Cited by
The Biochemistry and Cell Biology of Antigen Processing and Presentation
Germain, R. (1993) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.11.1.403 · Cited by 1,020
A guide to antigen processing and presentation
Pishesha, N., Harmand, T. J., & Ploegh, H. L. (2022) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-022-00707-2 · Cited by 805
Evidence for a differential avidity model of T cell selection in the thymus
Ashton-Rickardt, P. G., Bandeira, A., Delaney, J. R., Van Kaer, L., Pircher, H.-P., Zinkernagel, R. M., & Tonegawa, S. (1994) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90505-3 · Cited by 668
Nine major HLA class I supertypes account for the vast preponderance of HLA-A and -B polymorphism
Sette, A., & Sidney, J. (1999) · Immunogenetics · doi:10.1007/s002510050594 · Cited by 635
Restifo, N. P., Marincola, F. M., Kawakami, Y., Taubenberger, J., Yannelli, J. R., & Rosenberg, S. A. (1996) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/88.2.100 · Cited by 533
Metadata
- Authors
- Matsumura, M., Fremont, D. H., Peterson, P. A., & Wilson, L. A.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1992-08-14
- Volume
- 257
- Issue
- 5072
- Pages
- 927-934
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2019993505
- Cited by
- 731
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emerging Principles for the Recognition of Peptide Antigens by MHC Class I Molecules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1323878
- The paper
- Matsumura, M., Fremont, D. H., Peterson, P. A., & Wilson, L. A. (1992). Emerging Principles for the Recognition of Peptide Antigens by MHC Class I Molecules. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1323878
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.