Cited by 805Immunotherapy and Immune Responsesvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesT-cell and B-cell Immunology

A guide to antigen processing and presentation

Pishesha, Novalia, Harmand, Thibault J., Ploegh, Hidde L.·2022·Nature Reviews Immunology

Abstract

Antigen processing and presentation are the cornerstones of adaptive immunity. B cells cannot generate high-affinity antibodies without T cell help. CD4+ T cells, which provide such help, use antigen-specific receptors that recognize major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules in complex with peptide cargo. Similarly, eradication of virus-infected cells often depends on cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, which rely on the recognition of peptide-MHC complexes for their action. The two major classes of glycoproteins entrusted with antigen presentation are the MHC class I and class II molecules, which present antigenic peptides to CD8+ T cells and CD4+ T cells, respectively. This Review describes the essentials of antigen processing and presentation. These pathways are divided into six discrete steps that allow a comparison of the various means by which antigens destined for presentation are acquired and how the source proteins for these antigens are tagged for degradation, destroyed and ultimately displayed as peptides in complex with MHC molecules for T cell recognition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41577-022-00707-2

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pishesha, N., Harmand, T. J., & Ploegh, H. L.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Ploegh, Hidde L.
Venue
Nature Reviews Immunology
Published
2022-04-13
Volume
22
Issue
12
Pages
751-764
ISSN
  • 1474-1733 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1741
OpenAlex
W4224120598
Cited by
805
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 193 · 2025: 257 · 2024: 198 · 2023: 132 · 2022: 24 · 2012: 1
FWCI
16.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
antigen processing and presentation, MHC class I, MHC class II, peptide-MHC complex, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, T cell recognition, adaptive immunity, antigen degradation, cytotoxic T lymphocytes
MeSH terms
Antigens, Histocompatibility Antigens Class II, Humans, Major Histocompatibility Complex, Peptides, Histocompatibility Antigens Class I, Antigen Presentation, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review