Cited by 165Bacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria

Formation of a Gated Channel by a Ligand-Specific Transport Protein in the Bacterial Outer Membrane

Rutz, Jeanette M., Liu, Jun, Lyons, Jeri Ann, Goranson, Joanne, Armstrong, Sandra K., McIntosh, Mark A., Feix, Jimmy B., Klebba, Phillip E.·1992·Science

Abstract

The ferric enterobactin receptor (FepA) is a high-affinity ligand-specific transport protein in the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. Deletion of the cell-surface ligand-binding peptides of FepA generated mutant proteins that were incapable of high-affinity uptake but that instead formed nonspecific, passive channels in the outer membrane. Unlike native FepA, these pores acted independently of the accessory protein TonB, which suggests that FepA is a gated porin and that TonB acts as its gatekeeper by facilitating the entry of ligands into the FepA channel. The sequence homology among TonB-dependent proteins suggests that all ligand-specific outer membrane receptors may function by this gated-porin mechanism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1411544

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • OM ferric siderophore receptors are TonB-dependent members of the porin superfamily, called TonB-dependent transporters or ligand-gated porins.

    “OM ferric siderophore receptors are TonB-dependent members of the porin superfamily.Hence, they are called TonB-dependent transporters (14) or ligand-gated porins [LGP (15)], in the latter case because ligand binding activates their TonB-depend ent transport process.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rutz, J. M., Liu, J., Lyons, J. A., Goranson, J., Armstrong, S. K., McIntosh, M. A., Feix, J. B., & Klebba, P. E.
Affiliations
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
  • Department of Microbiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226.
  • East Carolina University (US)
  • University of Missouri (US)
Venue
Science
Published
1992-10-16
Volume
258
Issue
5081
Pages
471-475
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1969795354
Cited by
165
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (7r01ai022608-03, 5r01gm040565-04)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM22923, GM40565)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI22608)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Keywords
FepA, TonB, outer membrane receptor, Gram-negative bacterial outer membrane, iron absorption
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Antigens, Bacterial, Antigens, Surface, Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins, Carrier Proteins, DNA Mutational Analysis, Enterobactin, Escherichia coli, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Molecular Sequence Data, Receptors, Cell Surface, Structure-Activity Relationship, Ion Channel Gating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review