Cited by 104

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Aboriginal Drained-Field Cultivation in the Americas: Pre-Columbian reclamation of wet lands was widespread in the savannas and highlands of Latin America

Denevan, William M.·1970·Science

Abstract

The three main types of land reclamation in aboriginal America were irrigation, terracing, and drainage. Of these, drainage techniques have received the least attention, probably because they are no longer important and because the remnants are not conspicuous. Nevertheless, drained-field cultivation was widespread and was practiced in varied environments, including high-land basins, tropical savannas, and temperate flood plains. Sites ranged from seasonally waterlogged or flooded areas to permanent lakes. Ridging, mounding, and ditching were emphasized, rather than diking. Tools were simple, crops varied, and fertilization was accomplished mainly by mulching. The presence of drainage agriculture probably indicates that populations exceeded the carrying capacity of the more easily cultivated land. When populations declined, following the conquest by Europeans, the drained fields were probably given up because of the large amount of labor required to cultivate them. Most of these lands are now used only for cattle, but could undoubtedly be reclaimed again for agriculture. However, the cost of such reclamation might be prohibitive where populations are sparse, transportation is poor, and distances to markets are long. The chinampas of Mexico are an exception, since there is a major urban market close at hand. The aboriginal cultures responsible for drainage ranged from the seminomadic Guato, to farm villages and chiefdoms, to the high civilizations. The ridged-field farmers of the savannas were capable people but certainly not comparable to the farmers of the efficient and sophisticated states of the Andes and Mexico. Most of the drained-field systems could have been constructed and managed through small-scale family and community cooperation, as in New Guinea, rather than through central political control. On the other hand, there does seem to be a frequent relationship between degree of agricultural intensification, population size, and complexity of social organization. Unfortunately, not much is known yet about the intensification process for drained-field cultivation or for other reclamation systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.169.3946.647

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • El manejo del agua a través de la construcción de estructuras en tierra fue un elemento central de la organización de varios grupos prehispánicos de América, tanto en ambientes de montaña como en tierras bajas tropicales, para facilitar la ocupación del territorio y desarrollar prácticas agrícolas.

    “El manejo del agua a través de la construcción de estructuras en tierra fue un elemento central de la organización de varios grupos prehispánicos de América, tanto en ambientes de montaña como en las tierras bajas tropicales, con el fin de facilitar la ocupación del territorio y de desarrollar prácticas agrícolas”
  • Salvo el caso de México, donde el sistema de chinampas se conoce desde el período colonial, estos sistemas agrícolas cayeron en el olvido, siendo redescubiertos apenas en el siglo XX.

    “Sin embargo, salvo el caso de México, donde el sistema de chinampas se conoce desde el período colonial, sin haber perdido su vigencia, estos sistemas agrícolas cayeron en el olvido, siendo redescubiertos apenas en el siglo XX”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. ARMILLAS, P, AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST 70: 416 (1968). · DOI
  2. BRASS, L.J., GEOGRAPHICAL REVIEW 31: 555 (1941). · DOI
  3. Bristol, M. L., Actas y Memorias, XXXVII Congreso Internacional de Americanistas, Republica Argentina 2: 575 (1968).
  4. BROADBENT, S, NAWPA PACHA 6: 135 (1968). · DOI · Paper page
  5. BROOKFIELD, H.C., LOCAL STUDY AND COMPARATIVE METHOD - AN EXAMPLE FROM CENTRAL NEW-GUINEA, ANNALS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS 52: 242 (1962). · DOI
  6. BROOKFIELD, H.C., ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GEOGRAPHERS 52: 242 (1962). · DOI
  7. CARNEIRO, R.L., RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SIZE OF POPULATION AND COMPLEXITY OF SOCIAL ORGANIZATION, SOUTHWESTERN JOURNAL OF ANTHROPOLOGY 23: 234 (1967). · DOI
  8. CLARKE, W.C., FROM EXTENSIVE TO INTENSIVE SHIFTING CULTIVATION - A SUCCESSION FROM NEW GUINEA, ETHNOLOGY 5: 347 (1966). · DOI
  9. Coe, M. D., Scientific American 211:90 (1964).
  10. CRUXENT, J.M., BOLETIN INFORMATIVO. INSTITUTO VENEZOLANO DE INVESTIGACIONES CIENTIFICAS 4: 10 (1966).
  11. de Castellanos, J., Elegias de varones ilustres de Indias 1: 539 (1955).
  12. DENEVAN, W.M., ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON THE EARTHWORKS OF MOJOS IN NORTHEASTERN BOLIVIA, AMERICAN ANTIQUITY 28: 540 (1963). · DOI
  13. DENEVAN, W.M., BOLETIN DE LA SOCIEDAD GEOGRAFICA E HISTORICA "SUCRE" 47 446: 91 (1962).
  14. DENEVAN, W.M., IBERO AMERICANA 48: 84 (1966).
  15. DENEVAN, W.M., IBERO AMERICANA 48: 116 (1966).
  16. Deuel, L., Flights into Yesterday: The Story of Aerial Archaeology: 40 (1969).
  17. DONKIN, R.A., BOLETIN DE LA SOCIEDAD GEOGRAFICA DE COLOMBIA 26: 199 (1968).
  18. EIDT, R.C., ABORIGINAL CHIBCHA SETTLEMENT IN COLOMBIA, ANNALS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS 49: 374 (1959). · DOI
  19. FAULKNER, O.T., TROPICAL AGRICULTURE (TRINIDAD) 21: 177 (1944).
  20. 10.1126/science.158.3800.445 · DOI
  21. FOWLER, M.L., MIDDLE MISSISSIPPIAN AGRICULTURAL FIELDS, AMERICAN ANTIQUITY 34: 365 (1969). · DOI
  22. FOX, G.R., WISCONSIN ARCHAEOLOGIST 40: 1 (1959).
  23. Gardner, R., Gardens of War: 92 (1968).
  24. 10.1126/science.156.3772.175 · DOI
  25. Gumilla, J., El Orinoco ilustrado: 430 (1945).
  26. HALLSWORTH, E.G., STUDIES IN PEDOGENESIS IN NEW-SOUTH-WALES .7. THE GILGAI SOILS, JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE 6: 1 (1955). · DOI
  27. LAEYENDECKERROO.DM, LEIDSE GEOLOGISCHE MEDEDELINGEN 38: 31 (1966).
  28. LAMPERT, R.J., HORTICULTURE IN NEW-GUINEA HIGHLANDS - C14 DATING, ANTIQUITY 41: 307 (1967). · DOI
  29. Leeds, A., The Evolution of Horticultural Systems in Native South America: Causes and Consequences: 13 (1961).
  30. MORIARTY, J.R., AMERICA INDIGENA 28: 461 (1968).
  31. Netting, R. M., Hill Farmers of Nigeria: Cultural Ecology of the Kofyar of the Jus Plateau: 58 (1968).
  32. NORDENSKIOLD, E, YMER 36: 138 (1916).
  33. PARSONS, J.J., RIDGED FIELDS IN RIO-GUAYAS-VALLEY, ECUADOR, AMERICAN ANTIQUITY 34: 76 (1969). · DOI
  34. PARSONS, J.J., ANCIENT RIDGED FIELDS OF SAN-JORGE RIVER FLOODPLAIN, COLOMBIA, GEOGRAPHICAL REVIEW 56: 317 (1966). · DOI
  35. PARSONS, J.J., SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN 217: 92 (1967).
  36. PESKE, G.R., WISCONSIN ARCHAEOLOGIST 47: 188 (1966).
  37. PLAFKER, G, OBSERVATIONS ON ARCHAEOLOGICAL REMAINS IN NORTHEASTERN BOLIVIA, AMERICAN ANTIQUITY 28: 372 (1963). · DOI
  38. PLAFKER, G, BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 75: 503 (1964). · DOI
  39. REICHEL-DOLMATOF.G, DIVULGACIONES ETNOLOGICAS 3 4: 1 (1953).
  40. Rouse, I., Venezuelan Archaeology: 88 (1963).
  41. 10.1126/science.164.3880.712 · DOI
  42. SCHMIDT, M, BAESSLER ARCHIV 4: 251 (1914).
  43. Schoolcraft, H. R., Archives of Aboriginal Knowledge 1: 58 (1860).
  44. SMITH, C.T., ANCIENT RIDGED FIELDS IN REGION OF LAKE TITICACA, GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL 134: 353 (1968). · DOI
  45. Smith, C. T., Historical Geography of Western Europe Before 1800: 444 (1967).
  46. Smith, C. T., Current Anthropology 11: 453 (1970). · DOI
  47. 10.1126/science.166.3905.557 · DOI
  48. Sturtevant, W. C., The Evolution of Horticultural Systems in Native South America: Causes and Consequences: 69 (1961).
  49. VON ROSEN, E, YMER 44: 181 (1924).
  50. WEST, R.C., CUADERNOS AM 50: 165 (1950).
  51. West, R. C., Actas del XXXIII Congreso Internacional de Americanistas 1: 279 (1959).
  52. WILKEN, G.C., DRAINED-FIELD AGRICULTURE - INTENSIVE FARMING SYSTEM IN TLAXCALA, MEXICO, GEOGRAPHICAL REVIEW 59: 215 (1969). · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Denevan, W. M.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Venue
Science
Published
1970-08-14
Volume
169
Issue
3946
Pages
647-654
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
Cited by
104
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review