Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dopaminergic and Noradrenergic Substrates of Positive Reinforcement: Differential Effects of d - and l -Amphetamine

Phillips, Anthony G., Fibiger, Hans C.·1973·Science

Abstract

Intracranial self-stimulation was elicited from electrodes located in either the lateral hypothalamus or substantia nigra of the rat. Facilitatory effects of d- and l- isomers of amphetamine on self-stimulation were assessed. The d- isomer was seven to ten times more effective than the l- isomer at the hypothalamic placement, whereas the two isomers were equipotent for substantia nigra electrodes. These data support the hypothesis that both dopaminergic and noradrenergic systems subserve positive reinforcement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.179.4073.575

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
Phillips, A. G., & Fibiger, H. C.
Venue
Science
Published
1973-02-09
Volume
179
Issue
4073
Pages
575-577
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2059147280
Cited by
196
References
0
FWCI
13.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dopaminergic and Noradrenergic Substrates of Positive Reinforcement: Differential Effects of d - and l -Amphetamine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.179.4073.575
The paper
Phillips, A. G., & Fibiger, H. C. (1973). Dopaminergic and Noradrenergic Substrates of Positive Reinforcement: Differential Effects of d - and l -Amphetamine. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.179.4073.575

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.