The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Relative Operating Characteristic in Psychology: A technique for isolating effects of response bias finds wide use in the study of perception and cognition.
Abstract
The clinician looking, listening, or feeling for signs of a disease may far prefer a false alarm to a miss, particularly if the disease is serious and contagious. On the other hand, he may believe that the available therapy is marginally effective, expensive, and debilitating. The pilot seeing the landing lights only when they are a few yards away may decide that his plane is adequately aligned with the runway if he is alone and familiar with that plight. He may be more inclined to circle the field before another try at landing if he has many passengers and recent memory of another plane crashing under those circumstances. The Food and Drug administrator suspecting botulism in a canned food may not want to accept even a remote threat to the public health. But he may be less clearly biased if a recent false alarm has cost a canning company millions of dollars and left some damaged reputations. The making of almost any fine discrimination is beset with such considerations of probability and utility, which are extraneous and potentially confounding when one is attempting to measure the acuity of discrimination per se. The ROC is an analytical technique, with origins in statistical decision theory and electronic detection theory, that quite effectively isolates the effects of the observer's response bias, or decision criterion, in the study of discrimination behavior. This capability, pursued through a century of psychological testing, provides a relatively pure measure of the discriminability of different stimuli and of the capacity of organisms to discriminate. The ROC also treats quantitatively the response, or decision, aspects of choice behavior. The decision parameter can then be functionally related to the probabilities of the stimulus alternatives and to the utilities of the various stimulus-response pairs, or to the observer's expectations and motivations. In separating and quantifying discrimination and decision processes, the ROC promises a more reliable and valid solution to some practical problems and enhances our understanding of the perceptual and cognitive phenomena that depend directly on these fundamental processes. In several problem areas in psychology, effects that were supposed to reflect properties of the discrimination process have been shown by the ROC analysis to reflect instead properties of the decision process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A law of comparative judgment.
Thurstone, L. L. (1927) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0070288 · Cited by 5,210
Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025327 · Cited by 2,827
IX. On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses
Neyman, J., & Pearson, E. S. (1933) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character · doi:10.1098/rsta.1933.0009 · Cited by 2,341
ON THE PROBLEM OF THE MOST EFFICIENT TESTS OF STATISTICAL HYPOTHESES
(1967) · Joint Statistical Papers · doi:10.1525/9780520339897-008 · Cited by 1,504
A decision-making theory of visual detection.
Tanner, W. P., & Swets, J. A. (1954) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0058700 · Cited by 1,317
Self-citationNonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: Computing formulas.
Grier, J. B. (1971) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0031246 · Cited by 1,039
Dorfman, D. D., & Alf, E. (1969) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-2496(69)90019-4 · Cited by 874
The theory of signal detectability
Peterson, W., Birdsall, T., & Fox, W. (1954) · Transactions of the IRE Professional Group on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1954.1057460 · Cited by 867
Thurstone, L. L. (1927) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1415006 · Cited by 556
Signal detection theory and human memory.
Banks, W. P. (1970) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0029531 · Cited by 473
Cited by
pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves
Robin, X., Turck, N., Hainard, A., Tiberti, N., Lisacek, F., Sanchez, J.-C., & Müller, M. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-77 · Cited by 13,697
Measuring the Accuracy of Diagnostic Systems
Swets, J. A. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3287615 · Cited by 10,058
Self-citationCalculation of signal detection theory measures
Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N. (1999) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03207704 · Cited by 2,673
The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance
Glas, A. S., Lijmer, J. G., Prins, M. H., Bonsel, G. J., & Bossuyt, P. M. M. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00177-x · Cited by 2,261
Genuine memory deficits in dementia
Grober, E., & Buschke, H. (1987) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565648709540361 · Cited by 1,047
Metadata
- Authors
- Swets, J. A.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1973-12-07
- Volume
- 182
- Issue
- 4116
- Pages
- 990-1000
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1970611288
- Cited by
- 731
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 6.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Relative Operating Characteristic in Psychology: A technique for isolating effects of response bias finds wide use in the study of perception and cognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.182.4116.990
- The paper
- Swets, J. A. (1973). The Relative Operating Characteristic in Psychology: A technique for isolating effects of response bias finds wide use in the study of perception and cognition. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.182.4116.990
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.