The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Big Is a Chunk?: By combining data from several experiments, a basic human memory unit can be identified and measured.
Abstract
I have explored some of the interactions between research on higher mental processes over the past decade or two and laboratory experiments on simpler cognitive processes. I have shown that, by viewing experimentation in a parameter-estimating paradigm instead of a hypothesis-testing paradigm, one can obtain much more information from experiments—information that, combined with contemporary theoretical models of the cognitive processes, has implications for human performance on tasks quite different from those of the original experiments. The work of identifying and measuring the basic parameters of the human information processing system has just begun, but already important information has been gained. The psychological reality of the chunk has been fairly well demonstrated, and the chunk capacity of short-term memory has been shown to be in the range of five to seven. Fixation of information in long-term memory has been shown to take about 5 or 10 seconds per chunk. Some other "magical numbers" have been estimated—for example, visual scanning speeds and times required for simple grammatical transformations—and no doubt others remain to be discovered. But even the two basic constants discussed in this article—short-term memory capacity and rate of fixation in long-term memory—organize, systematize, and explain a wide range of findings, about both simple tasks and more complex cognitive performances that have been reported in the psychological literature over the past 50 years or more.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
Cited by
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779
Individual differences in working memory and reading
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(80)90312-6 · Cited by 6,336
A spreading activation theory of memory.
Anderson, J. R. (1983) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(83)90201-3 · Cited by 2,199
Preston, C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/s0001-6918(99)00050-5 · Cited by 2,106
Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning
Mayer, R. E. (2014) · The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139547369.005 · Cited by 1,976
Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning
Mayer, R. E. (2005) · The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816819.004 · Cited by 1,602
Why Some Material Is Difficult to Learn
Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1203_1 · Cited by 1,455
Kozma, R. B. (1991) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543061002179 · Cited by 1,429
Arousal, activation, and effort in the control of attention.
Pribram, K. H., & McGuinness, D. (1975) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0076780 · Cited by 1,208
The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems
Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1980) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358886.358895 · Cited by 1,174
Chunking mechanisms in human learning
GOBET, F., LANE, P., CROKER, S., CHENG, P., JONES, G., OLIVER, I., & PINE, J. (2001) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01662-4 · Cited by 1,157
The Distributed Nature of Working Memory
Christophel, T. B., Klink, P. C., Spitzer, B., Roelfsema, P. R., & Haynes, J.-D. (2017) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.12.007 · Cited by 882
Information Load and Consumer Decision Making
Malhotra, N. K. (1982) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208882 · Cited by 778
Fitch, W. T. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511817779 · Cited by 594
When two sensory modes are better than one.
Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.3.4.257 · Cited by 559
Baird, A., & Maruping, L. M. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/15882 · Cited by 512
Studies of scientific discovery: Complementary approaches and convergent findings.
Klahr, D., & Simon, H. A. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.5.524 · Cited by 352
Self-citationSTM capacity for Chinese words and idioms: Chunking and acoustical loop hypotheses
Zhang, G., & Simon, H. A. (1985) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197681 · Cited by 283
Self-citationLearning Science and the Science of Learning
Novak, J. D. (1988) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057268808559949 · Cited by 249
Animal intelligence as encephalization
Jerison, H. J. (1985) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1985.0007 · Cited by 234
Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2011) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1730 · Cited by 219
Big data analytics: transforming data to action
Bumblauskas, D., Nold, H., Bumblauskas, P., & Igou, A. (2017) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/bpmj-03-2016-0056 · Cited by 130
Chan, R. Y. K. (2000) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2000.11104806 · Cited by 130
Recall memory for visually presented chess positions
Frey, P. W., & Adesman, P. (1976) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03213216 · Cited by 129
(2012) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 127
Simulation of expert memory using EPAM IV.
Richman, H. B., Staszewski, J. J., & Simon, H. A. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.305 · Cited by 124
Self-citation(2003) · ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) · Cited by 124
Kuhn, G. J. (2002) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1197/aemj.9.7.740 · Cited by 126
Metadata
- Authors
- Simon, H. A.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1974-02-08
- Volume
- 183
- Issue
- 4124
- Pages
- 482-488
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2085886084
- Cited by
- 925
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.