The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visual Detection of Line Segments: An Object-Superiority Effect
Abstract
Observers identified a briefly flashed line segment more accurately when it was part of a drawing that looked unitary and three-dimensional than when the line was in one of several less coherent flat designs.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“An example of our superior perceptual-motor abilities is the Object Superiority Effect: we perceive and interpret whole objects faster and more effective than the (more simple) individual elements that make up these objects (Weisstein and Harris, 1974; McClelland, 1978; Williams and Weisstein, 1978; Pomerantz, 1981).”
From Human- versus Artificial Intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as Weisstein and Harris, 1974
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
New Tables for Multiple Comparisons with a Control
Dunnett, C. W. (1964) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2528490 · Cited by 3,105
Single Units and Sensation: A Neuron Doctrine for Perceptual Psychology?
Barlow, H. B. (1972) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p010371 · Cited by 1,714
Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material
Reicher, G. M. (1969) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027768 · Cited by 1,252
Wheeler, D. D. (1970) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(70)90005-8 · Cited by 746
Biederman, I. (1972) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.177.4043.77 · Cited by 683
An analysis of the word-superiority effect
Baron, J., & Thurston, I. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90012-1 · Cited by 353
Perception of Letters in Words: Seek Not and Ye Shall Find
Johnston, J. C., & McClelland, J. L. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.184.4142.1192 · Cited by 158
Visual factors in word perception
Johnston, J. C., & McClelland, J. L. (1973) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03212406 · Cited by 125
Why words are perceived more accurately than nonwords: Inference versus unitization.
Smith, E. E., & Haviland, S. E. (1972) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0032146 · Cited by 61
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- CLOWES, M.B., MACHINE PERCEPTION P: 243 (1972).
- EGETH, H, BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY 2: 329 (1973).
- NEISSER, U, COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY: 105 (1968).
- WINSTON, P.H., MACHINE INTELL 7: 431 (1972).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barsalou, L. W. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99002149 · Cited by 6,887
Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition
Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/14640749308401045 · Cited by 2,179
On the economy of the human-processing system.
Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1979) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.86.3.214 · Cited by 1,737
Marcel, A. J. (1983) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(83)90010-5 · Cited by 913
Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist.
Alinda Friedman, A. (1979) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.108.3.316 · Cited by 740
Metadata
- Authors
- Weisstein, N., & Harris, C. S.
- Affiliations
- Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1974-11-22
- Volume
- 186
- Issue
- 4165
- Pages
- 752-755
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2026041484
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Keywords
- visual detection, line segments, visual perception, figure-ground perception, 3D perception, visual coherence
- MeSH terms
- Discrimination, Psychological, Fixation, Ocular, Form Perception, Humans, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Space Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review