Cited by 141Game Theory and Voting SystemsMedical Education and AdmissionsHealthcare Policy and Management

New physicians: A natural experiment in market organization

Roth, Alvin E.·1990·Science

Abstract

The National Resident Matching Program is a centralized clearinghouse through which new medical graduates in the United States obtain their first positions. The history of this market, from the market failures that the centralized system was designed to address, to the present, is discussed, and a hypothesis about the behavior of such markets is presented. New evidence is then presented from a set of similar centralized markets in the United Kingdom. Because some of these latter markets have failed, while others have succeeded, they provide a natural experiment that permits the hypothesis to be tested. The new evidence also suggests directions in which modifications of existing procedures might be considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.2274783

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Those responsible for maintaining the NRMP responded conscientiously to this societal change and modified the system's algorithm to place couples more fairly.

    “those responsible for maintaining the system responded conscientiously to this societal change and modified the system's algorithm to place couples more fairly [Roth 1990].”

    From Bias in computer systems (1996) · cites this paper as Roth 1990

  • The original design of the NRMP Admissions Algorithm did not deal well with the changing social conditions when significant numbers of dual-career couples participated in the match.

    “Although the original design of the Admissions Algorithm did not deal well with the changing social conditions (when significant numbers of dual-career couples participated in the match)”

    From Bias in computer systems (1996) · cites this paper as Roth 1990

  • The original NRMP Admissions Algorithm placed married couples at a disadvantage in achieving an optimal placement compared with their single peers.

    “At this point, it was discovered that the original Admissions Algorithm placed married couples at a disadvantage in achieving an optimal placement as compared with their single peers [Roth 1984;1990].”

    From Bias in computer systems (1996) · cites this paper as Roth 1990

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 6 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roth, A. E.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Roth, Alvin E.
Venue
Science
Published
1990-12-14
Volume
250
Issue
4987
Pages
1524-1528
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2050963707
Cited by
141
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
13.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
National Resident Matching Program, centralized matching, physician employment, residency training, labor market organization, market failure, matching markets
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Economic Competition, Employment, United Kingdom, Hospitals, Information Centers, Internship and Residency, Personnel Staffing and Scheduling Information Systems, United States, Program Evaluation, History, 20th Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review