Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 574

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Graphical Perception and Graphical Methods for Analyzing Scientific Data

Cleveland, William S., McGill, Robert·1985·Science

Abstract

Graphical perception is the visual decoding of the quantitative and qualitative information encoded on graphs. Recent investigations have uncovered basic principles of human graphical perception that have important implications for the display of data. The computer graphics revolution has stimulated the invention of many graphical methods for analyzing and presenting scientific data, such as box plots, two-tiered error bars, scatterplot smoothing, dot charts, and graphing on a log base 2 scale.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.229.4716.828

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 574

Metadata

Authors
Cleveland, W. S., & McGill, R.
Venue
Science
Published
1985-08-30
Volume
229
Issue
4716
Pages
828-833
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2017756939
Cited by
574
References
1
FWCI
12.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Graphical Perception and Graphical Methods for Analyzing Scientific Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.229.4716.828
The paper
Cleveland, W. S., & McGill, R. (1985). Graphical Perception and Graphical Methods for Analyzing Scientific Data. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.229.4716.828

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.