Cited by 682Data Visualization and AnalyticsRisk Perception and ManagementClimate Change Communication and Perception

Visualizing Uncertainty About the Future

Spiegelhalter, David, Pearson, Mike, Short, Ian·2011·Science

Abstract

We are all faced with uncertainty about the future, but we can get the measure of some uncertainties in terms of probabilities. Probabilities are notoriously difficult to communicate effectively to lay audiences, and in this review we examine current practice for communicating uncertainties visually, using examples drawn from sport, weather, climate, health, economics, and politics. Despite the burgeoning interest in infographics, there is limited experimental evidence on how different types of visualizations are processed and understood, although the effectiveness of some graphics clearly depends on the relative numeracy of an audience. Fortunately, it is increasingly easy to present data in the form of interactive visualizations and in multiple types of representation that can be adjusted to user needs and capabilities. Nonetheless, communicating deeper uncertainties resulting from incomplete or disputed knowledge--or from essential indeterminacy about the future--remains a challenge.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1191181

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To overcome the adverse effect of denominator neglect, it is important to present ratios with the same denominator so that they can be compared with just the numerator.

    “First, to overcome the adverse effect of denominator neglect, it is important to present ratios with the same denominator so that they can be compared with just the numerator [116].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spiegelhalter, D., Pearson, M., & Short, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • The Open University (GB)
Corresponding author
Spiegelhalter, David
Venue
Science
Published
2011-09-09
Volume
333
Issue
6048
Pages
1393-1400
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2015011409
Cited by
682
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 42
FWCI
8.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
Keywords
uncertainty communication, probability communication, infographics, interactive visualization, numeracy, lay audiences, future uncertainty, climate uncertainty, weather forecasting, health communication, economics communication, sport
MeSH terms
Computer Graphics, Data Display, Forecasting, Humans, Probability, Risk, Information Dissemination, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review