Cited by 931HIV/AIDS drug development and treatmentHIV Research and TreatmentEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

Fidelity of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase

Preston, Bradley D., Poiesz, Bernard J., Loeb, Lawrence A.·1988·Science

Abstract

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) shows extensive genetic variation and undergoes rapid evolution. The fidelity of purified HIV-1 reverse transcriptase was measured during DNA polymerization in vitro by means of three different assays. Reverse transcriptase from HIV-1 introduced base-substitution errors in DNA from the bacteriophage φX174 amber 3 at estimated frequencies of 1/2000 to 1/4000. Analyses of misincorporation rates opposite a single template adenine residue showed that HIV-1 reverse transcriptase catalyzed nucleotide mismatches with a specificity of A:C >> A:G > A:A. The high error rate of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase in vitro translates to approximately five to ten errors per HIV-1 genome per round of replication in vivo. This high error rate suggests that misincorporation by HIV-1 reverse transcriptase is, at least in part, responsible for the hypermutability of the AIDS virus. The specificity of misincorporation may provide a basis for the systematic construction of antiviral nucleosides.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.2460924

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HIV-1 is more error-prone than HTLV and BLV because it replicates actively.

    “making them error-prone, especially for actively replicating retroviruses such as HIV-1 compared to others, such as HTLV and BLV”
  • Retroviral RTs lack proofreading mechanisms such as 3′ exonuclease activity, making them error-prone.

    “The low fidelity of RT is primarily because retroviral RTs lack proofreading mechanisms (such as 3′ exonuclease activity), making them error-prone, especially for actively replicating retroviruses such as HIV-1 compared to others, such as HTLV and BLV (Battula and Loeb 1976, Starcich et al. 1986, Preston et al. 1988, Ratner et al. 1991, Dube et al. 1993, Willems et al. 1993).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Preston, B. D., Poiesz, B. J., & Loeb, L. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University (US)
Venue
Science
Published
1988-11-25
Volume
242
Issue
4882
Pages
1168-1171
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2090126383
Cited by
931
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 42
FWCI
35.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01ai072654-005, 5r35ca039903-14)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA-07263-03, R 35-CA-39903)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (N01AI72654)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › HIV Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
HIV-1 reverse transcriptase, error rate, nucleotide mismatch
MeSH terms
DNA, DNA Polymerase II, DNA, Viral, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, HIV, Kinetics, Moloney murine leukemia virus, Mutation, Avian Myeloblastosis Virus, Nucleotides, Bacteriophage phi X 174, RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review