The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Equilibrium-Point Control Hypothesis Examined by Measured Arm Stiffness During Multijoint Movement
Abstract
For the last 20 years, it has been hypothesized that well-coordinated, multijoint movements are executed without complex computation by the brain, with the use of springlike muscle properties and peripheral neural feedback loops. However, it has been technically and conceptually difficult to examine this “equilibrium-point control” hypothesis directly in physiological or behavioral experiments. A high-performance manipulandum was developed and used here to measure human arm stiffness, the magnitude of which during multijoint movement is important for this hypothesis. Here, the equilibrium-point trajectory was estimated from the measured stiffness, the actual trajectory, and the generated torque. Its velocity profile differed from that of the actual trajectory. These results argue against the hypothesis that the brain sends as a motor command only an equilibrium-point trajectory similar to the actual trajectory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model
Flash, T., & Hogan, N. (1985) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.05-07-01688.1985 · Cited by 4,395
Inverse-dynamics model eye movement control by Purkinje cells in the cerebellum
Shidara, M., Kawano, K., Gomi, H., & Kawato, M. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/365050a0 · Cited by 393
Self-citation
Cited by
Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.
Kawato, M. (1999) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(99)00028-8 · Cited by 2,685
Self-citationInternal models in the cerebellum
Wolpert, D. M., Miall, R. C., & Kawato, M. (1998) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01221-2 · Cited by 2,469
Self-citationComputational principles of movement neuroscience
Wolpert, D. M., & Ghahramani, Z. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/81497 · Cited by 2,122
Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements
Desmurget, M., & Grafton, S. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01537-0 · Cited by 1,300
Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review
Tucker, M. R., Olivier, J., Pagel, A., Bleuler, H., Bouri, M., Lambercy, O., Millán, J. D. R., Riener, R., Vallery, H., & Gassert, R. (2015) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-12-1 · Cited by 1,047
“A leading theory regarding physiological movement is that the CNS controls the limbs through impedance control [203,204].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Gomi, H., & Kawato, M.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1996-04-05
- Volume
- 272
- Issue
- 5258
- Pages
- 117-120
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1965386059
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Equilibrium-Point Control Hypothesis Examined by Measured Arm Stiffness During Multijoint Movement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.272.5258.117
- The paper
- Gomi, H., & Kawato, M. (1996). Equilibrium-Point Control Hypothesis Examined by Measured Arm Stiffness During Multijoint Movement. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.272.5258.117
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.