Cited by 1,300Motor Control and AdaptationEmbodied and Extended CognitionAction Observation and Synchronization

Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements

Open access
Desmurget, Michel, Grafton, Scott·2000·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Delays in sensorimotor loops have led to the proposal that reaching movements are primarily under pre-programmed control and that sensory feedback loops exert an influence only at the very end of a trajectory. The present review challenges this view. Although behavioral data suggest that a motor plan is assembled prior to the onset of movement, more recent studies have indicated that this initial plan does not unfold unaltered, but is updated continuously by internal feedback loops. These loops rely on a forward model that integrates the sensory inflow and motor outflow to evaluate the consequence of the motor commands sent to a limb, such as the arm. In such a model, the probable position and velocity of an effector can be estimated with negligible delays and even predicted in advance, thus making feedback strategies possible for fast reaching movements. The parietal lobe and cerebellum appear to play a crucial role in this process. The ability of the motor system to estimate the future state of the limb might be an evolutionary substrate for mental operations that require an estimate of sequelae in the immediate future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01537-0

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mismatch detection and the forward model are involved in motor control, motor learning, and the sense of agency.

    “Mismatch detection and the forward model are involved in different aspects of motor execution: in motor control (for rapid online movement adaptation, for sensory attenuation), in motor learning (sensorimotor adaptation), but also for the sense of agency (Miall et al., 1993; Wolpert et al., 1998; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Blakemore and Sirigu, 2003; Jeannerod, 2009; Haggard, 2017; Dogge et al.,”
  • The cerebellum could be a comparator in the forward model considering its unique architecture and connectivity.

    “Among these areas, the cerebellum is of particular interest and could be a comparator considering its unique architecture and connectivity (Miall et al., 1993; Wolpert et al., 1998; Desmurget and Grafton, 2000; Blakemore and Sirigu, 2003; Ito, 2006, 2008; Jeannerod, 2009; Tanaka et al., 2020; Figure 1).”
  • The forward model integrates efference copy and sensory feedback to produce a prediction of the sensory consequences of the motor command.

    “The forward model integrates both the efference copy of the motor command and the sensory feedback to produce a prediction of the sensory consequences of the motor command.”
  • On-line motor correction using the forward model would be faster than the processing time of using sensory feedback alone.

    “On-line motor correction using the forward model would be faster than the processing time of using the sensory feedback alone.”
  • On-line motor control relies on a forward model.

    “It has thus been proposed that on-line motor control relies on a forward model.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Desmurget, M., & Grafton, S.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Grafton, Scott
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-11
Volume
4
Issue
11
Pages
423-431
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084145388
Cited by
1,300
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 51
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
forward model, sensorimotor delay, feedback control, reaching movements, motor planning, parietal lobe, cerebellum, motor control, mental time travel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review