The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developmental Control of Cell Cycle Regulators: A Fly's Perspective
Abstract
During early development in many species, maternally supplied gene products permit the cell cycle to run at maximum velocity, subdividing the fertilized egg into smaller and smaller cells. As development proceeds, zygotic controls are activated that first limit divisions to defined spatial and temporal domains, coordinating them with morphogenesis, and then halt proliferation altogether, to allow cell differentiation. Analysis of the regulation of cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) in Drosophila has provided insights into how this embryonic program of cell proliferation is controlled at the molecular level and how it is linked to developmental cues. Recent studies have also begun to reveal how cell proliferation is controlled during the second phase of Drosophila development, which occurs in imaginal tissues. In contrast to their embryonic progenitors, imaginal cells proliferate with a cycle that requires cell growth and is linked to patterning processes controlled by secreted cell signaling molecules. The functions of these signaling molecules appear to be nearly as conserved between vertebrates and invertebrates as the cell cycle control apparatus itself, suggesting that the mechanisms that coordinate growth, patterning, and cell proliferation in developing tissues have ancient origins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mice Lacking p21CIP1/WAF1 undergo normal development, but are defective in G1 checkpoint control
Deng, C., Zhang, P., Wade Harper, J., Elledge, S. J., & Leder, P. (1995) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90039-x · Cited by 2,113
A major developmental transition in early xenopus embryos: II. control of the onset of transcription
Newport, J., & Kirschner, M. (1982) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(82)90273-2 · Cited by 1,055
Justice, R. W., Zilian, O., Woods, D. F., Noll, M., & Bryant, P. J. (1995) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.9.5.534 · Cited by 977
Cited by
Integrating Genetic Approaches into the Discovery of Anticancer Drugs
Hartwell, L. H., Szankasi, P., Roberts, C. J., Murray, A. W., & Friend, S. H. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.278.5340.1064 · Cited by 773
Efficient Bypass of a Thymine-Thymine Dimer by Yeast DNA Polymerase, Polη
Johnson, R. E., Prakash, S., & Prakash, L. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.283.5404.1001 · Cited by 736
Eukaryotic Translesion Polymerases and Their Roles and Regulation in DNA Damage Tolerance
Waters, L. S., Minesinger, B. K., Wiltrout, M. E., D'Souza, S., Woodruff, R. V., & Walker, G. C. (2009) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00034-08 · Cited by 591
Mechanisms of accurate translesion synthesis by human DNA polymerase η
Masutani, C., Kusumoto, R., Iwai, S., & Hanaoka, F. (2000) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/19.12.3100 · Cited by 504
Specialized DNA Polymerases, Cellular Survival, and the Genesis of Mutations
Friedberg, E. C., Wagner, R., & Radman, M. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1070236 · Cited by 443
Metadata
- Authors
- Edgar, B. A., & Lehner, C. F.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1996-12-06
- Volume
- 274
- Issue
- 5293
- Pages
- 1646-1652
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2041024018
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developmental Control of Cell Cycle Regulators: A Fly's Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.274.5293.1646
- The paper
- Edgar, B. A., & Lehner, C. F. (1996). Developmental Control of Cell Cycle Regulators: A Fly's Perspective. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.274.5293.1646
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.