The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scaling Body Support in Mammals: Limb Posture and Muscle Mechanics
Abstract
The scaling of bone and muscle geometry in mammals suggests that peak stresses (ratio of force to cross-sectional area) acting in these two support elements increase with increasing body size. Observations of stresses acting in the limb bones of different sized mammals during strenuous activity, however, indicate that peak bone stress is independent of size (maintaining a safety factor of between 2 and 4). It appears that similar peak bone stresses and muscle stresses in large and small mammals are achieved primarily by a size-dependent change in locomotor limb posture: small animals run with crouched postures, whereas larger species run more upright. By adopting an upright posture, large animals align their limbs more closely with the ground reaction force, substantially reducing the forces that their muscles must exert (proportional to body mass 0.74 ) and hence, the forces that their bones must resist, to counteract joint moments. This change in limb posture to maintain locomotor stresses within safe limits, however, likely limits the maneuverability and accelerative capability of large animals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scaling: Why is Animal Size so Important?
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1984) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139167826 · Cited by 2,677
Dynamic properties of mammalian skeletal muscles.
Close, R. I. (1972) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1972.52.1.129 · Cited by 1,890
Cited by
Energetics of running: a new perspective
Kram, R., & Taylor, C. R. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/346265a0 · Cited by 821
Campione, N. E., & Evans, D. C. (2012) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/1741-7007-10-60 · Cited by 475
A Comparison of the Energetic Cost of Running in Marathon Racing Shoes
Hoogkamer, W., Kipp, S., Frank, J. H., Farina, E. M., Luo, G., & Kram, R. (2018) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0811-2 · Cited by 434
“This improves the mechanical advantage of the muscles acting around the joints, which reduces the energetic cost of body weight support [14, 37].”
BackgroundGriffin, T. M., Roberts, T. J., & Kram, R. (2003) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00944.2002 · Cited by 251
Muscle mechanical advantage of human walking and running: implications for energy cost
Biewener, A. A., Farley, C. T., Roberts, T. J., & Temaner, M. (2004) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00003.2004 · Cited by 246
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Biewener, A. A.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1989-07-07
- Volume
- 245
- Issue
- 4913
- Pages
- 45-48
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2001793234
- Cited by
- 869
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scaling Body Support in Mammals: Limb Posture and Muscle Mechanics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.2740914
- The paper
- Biewener, A. A. (1989). Scaling Body Support in Mammals: Limb Posture and Muscle Mechanics. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2740914
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.