Inner Core Rotation Rate from Small-Scale Heterogeneity and Time-Varying Travel Times
Abstract
The time it takes seismic waves to propagate from South Atlantic earthquakes through the inner core to station COL in Alaska has decreased systematically over the past 30 years. Travel times from three earthquakes in 1991 to an array of 37 seismometers in Alaska suggest that lateral gradients in seismic wavespeeds are steep in this part of the inner core. This combination of observations can be explained by postulating that the inner core is rotating 0.2° to 0.3° per year faster than the mantle.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Seismic observations have provided critical evidence for inner core differential rotation.
“Seismic observations have provided critical evidence for IC differential rotation (Creager, 1997;Song & Richards, 1996;Vidale et al., 2000), and different models have been proposed.”
From Pattern of Inner‐Core Differential Rotation From Long‐Term Earthquake Sequences and USArray Network (2026) · cites this paper as Creager, 1997
Inner-core rotation estimates are now converging from early estimates of several times larger.
“These estimates are now converging from early estimates of several times larger (e.g., Creager, 1997;Song & Richards, 1996).”
From Pattern of Inner‐Core Differential Rotation From Long‐Term Earthquake Sequences and USArray Network (2026) · cites this paper as Creager, 1997
Using the fine-scale gradient leads to a higher estimate of the rotation rate exceeding 0.2°/yr for super-rotation, close to results based on relatively large spatial structures.
“This will lead to a higher estimate of the rotation rate exceeding 0.2°/yr for super-rotation, close to the results based on relatively large spatial structures (Creager, 1997;Song, 2000;Tkalčić, 2024;Tkalčić et al., 2013;Zhang et al., 2005).”
From Pattern of Inner‐Core Differential Rotation From Long‐Term Earthquake Sequences and USArray Network (2026) · cites this paper as Creager, 1997
The paper resolves a fine-scale gradient, whereas earlier works typically adopted lateral gradients averaged over much larger scales of several tens of degrees.
“A key improvement is that we resolve a fine-scale gradient, whereas earlier works typically adopted lateral gradients averaged over much larger scales of several tens of degrees (e.g., Creager, 1997;Zhang et al., 2005).”
From Pattern of Inner‐Core Differential Rotation From Long‐Term Earthquake Sequences and USArray Network (2026) · cites this paper as Creager, 1997
Seismological observations confirmed differential rotation of the inner core relative to the mantle, with varying rotation rates in the eastward (prograde) direction, settling to the range from 0.3 to 1.1 years per degree faster than the mantle.
“These observations confirmed the theoretical predictions of differential rotation of the inner core relative to the mantle, with varying rotation rates in the eastward (prograde) direction, settling to the range from 0.3 to 1.1 years per degree faster than the mantle.”
From On the Inner‐Core Differential‐Rotation (Un)Resolvability From Earthquake Doublets: The Traps of Data Selection (2024) · cites this paper as Creager, 1997
The linearity in the observed velocity gradient in the volume of the inner core along the South Sandwich Islands region to Alaska (SSI-Alaska) path is a robust approximation.
“the linearity in the observed velocity gradient in the volume of the inner core along the South Sandwich Islands region to Alaska (SSI-Alaska) path (Creager, 1997) is shown to be a robust approximation (Tkalčić, Bodin, et al., 2013).”
From On the Inner‐Core Differential‐Rotation (Un)Resolvability From Earthquake Doublets: The Traps of Data Selection (2024) · cites this paper as Creager, 1997
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tkalčić, H. (2024) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2023gl107043 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“These theoretical predictions were validated by observing systematic changes over time in the travel times of inner‐core‐sensitive PKIKP waves (e.g., Creager, 1997; Richards et al., 1998; Song & Richards, 1996).”
BackgroundPattern of Inner‐Core Differential Rotation From Long‐Term Earthquake Sequences and USArray Network
Wu, K., Song, X., & Yang, Y. (2026) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2025gl119295 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Creager (1997) derived rotation rates using the mean gradient over an IC region spanning nearly 30° in longitude, but he also suggested that smaller‐scale lateral velocity variations might exist and thus affect the determination of the rotation rate.”
Influential
- Authors
- Creager, K. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Creager, Kenneth C.
- ORCID
- Creager, Kenneth C.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1997-11-14
- Volume
- 278
- Issue
- 5341
- Pages
- 1284-1288
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1983002709
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 13.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › High-pressure geophysics and materials
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Seismic Waves and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
- Keywords
- inner core rotation, seismic travel times, Earth's inner core
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review