Cited by 251Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Reduced Numbers of Somatostatin Receptors in the Cerebral Cortex in Alzheimer's Disease

Beal, M. Flint, Mazurek, Michael F., Tran, Vinh T., Chattha, Geetinder, Bird, Edward D., Martin, Joseph B.·1985·Science

Abstract

Somatostatin receptor concentrations were measured in patients with Alzheimer's disease and controls. In the frontal cortex (Brodmann areas 6, 9, and 10) and temporal cortex (Brodmann area 21), the concentrations of somatostatin in receptors in the patients were reduced to approximately 50 percent of control values. A 40 percent reduction was seen in the hippocampus, while no significant changes were found in the cingulate cortex, postcentral gyrus, temporal pole, and superior temporal gyrus. Scatchard analysis showed a reduction in receptor number rather than a change in affinity. Somatostatin-like immunoreactivity was significantly reduced in both the frontal and temporal cortex. Somatostatin-like immunoreactivity was linearly related to somatostatin-receptor binding in the cortices of Alzheimer's patients. These findings may reflect degeneration of postsynaptic neurons or cortical afferents in the patients' cerebral cortices. Alternatively, decreased somatostatin-like immunoreactivity in Alzheimer's disease might indicate increased release of somatostatin and down regulation of postsynaptic receptors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.2861661

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sst interneurons have been implicated in AD, but not at the same molecular, morphological and electrophysiological level, which was achieved in part by the neuronal enrichment strategy.

    “Sst interneurons have been implicated in AD53,55, but not at the same molecular, morphological and electrophysiological level, which was achieved, in part, by our neuronal enrichment strategy (harnessing fluorescence-activated nuclei sorting (FANS) to enrich neuronal populations).”

    From Integrated multimodal cell atlas of Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [53]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beal, M. F., Mazurek, M. F., Tran, V. T., Chattha, G., Bird, E. D., & Martin, J. B.
Affiliations
Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Venue
Science
Published
1985-07-19
Volume
229
Issue
4710
Pages
289-291
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1968053343
Cited by
251
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
28.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (P50AG005134)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (IR 23NS 19867-1, MN/NS31862)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
somatostatin receptors, Alzheimer's disease, cerebral cortex, hippocampus, receptor binding, frontal cortex, temporal cortex, neurodegeneration
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Cerebral Cortex, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neurons, Radioimmunoassay, Receptors, Cell Surface, Somatostatin, Temporal Lobe, Receptors, Somatostatin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review