The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sparse Coding and Decorrelation in Primary Visual Cortex During Natural Vision
Abstract
Theoretical studies suggest that primary visual cortex (area V1) uses a sparse code to efficiently represent natural scenes. This issue was investigated by recording from V1 neurons in awake behaving macaques during both free viewing of natural scenes and conditions simulating natural vision. Stimulation of the nonclassical receptive field increases the selectivity and sparseness of individual V1 neurons, increases the sparseness of the population response distribution, and strongly decorrelates the responses of neuron pairs. These effects are due to both excitatory and suppressive modulation of the classical receptive field by the nonclassical receptive field and do not depend critically on the spatiotemporal structure of the stimuli. During natural vision, the classical and nonclassical receptive fields function together to form a sparse representation of the visual world. This sparse code may be computationally efficient for both early vision and higher visual processing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images
Olshausen, B. A., & Field, D. J. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381607a0 · Cited by 5,694
Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex
Heeger, D. J. (1992) · Visual Neuroscience · doi:10.1017/s0952523800009640 · Cited by 1,835
Spatial Attention Effects in Macaque Area V4
Connor, C. E., Preddie, D. C., Gallant, J. L., & Van Essen, D. C. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-09-03201.1997 · Cited by 448
Self-citation
Cited by
Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science
Clark, A. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12000477 · Cited by 5,924
Computational modelling of visual attention
Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35058500 · Cited by 4,733
Natural Image Statistics and Neural Representation
Simoncelli, E. P., & Olshausen, B. A. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.1193 · Cited by 2,460
Sparse coding of sensory inputs
Olshausen, B. A., & Field, D. J. (2004) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2004.07.007 · Cited by 1,404
Energy limitation as a selective pressure on the evolution of sensory systems
Niven, J. E., & Laughlin, S. B. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.017574 · Cited by 1,056
Metadata
- Authors
- Vinje, W. E., & Gallant, J. L.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2000-02-18
- Volume
- 287
- Issue
- 5456
- Pages
- 1273-1276
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2058670155
- Cited by
- 1,275
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sparse Coding and Decorrelation in Primary Visual Cortex During Natural Vision. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.287.5456.1273
- The paper
- Vinje, W. E., & Gallant, J. L. (2000). Sparse Coding and Decorrelation in Primary Visual Cortex During Natural Vision. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5456.1273
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.