The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Neural Basis for General Intelligence
Open accessAbstract
Universal positive correlations between different cognitive tests motivate the concept of “general intelligence” or Spearman's g . Here the neural basis for g is investigated by means of positron emission tomography. Spatial, verbal, and perceptuo-motor tasks with high- g involvement are compared with matched low- g control tasks. In contrast to the common view that g reflects a broad sample of major cognitive functions, high- g tasks do not show diffuse recruitment of multiple brain regions. Instead they are associated with selective recruitment of lateral frontal cortex in one or both hemispheres. Despite very different task content in the three high- g –low- g contrasts, lateral frontal recruitment is markedly similar in each case. Many previous experiments have shown these same frontal regions to be recruited by a broad range of different cognitive demands. The results suggest that “general intelligence” derives from a specific frontal system important in the control of diverse forms of behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DEFICITS IN STRATEGY APPLICATION FOLLOWING FRONTAL LOBE DAMAGE IN MAN
SHALLICE, T., & BURGESS, P. W. (1991) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/114.2.727 · Cited by 2,017
Intelligence and the Frontal Lobe: The Organization of Goal-Directed Behavior
Duncan, J., Emslie, H., Williams, P., Johnson, R., & Freer, C. (1996) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1996.0008 · Cited by 902
Self-citationFluid intelligence after frontal lobe lesions
Duncan, J., Burgess, P., & Emslie, H. (1995) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(94)00124-8 · Cited by 537
Self-citation
Cited by
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2002) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196323 · Cited by 2,229
The multiple-demand (MD) system of the primate brain: mental programs for intelligent behaviour
Duncan, J. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.004 · Cited by 1,846
Self-citationShort-term meditation training improves attention and self-regulation
Tang, Y.-Y., Ma, Y., Wang, J., Fan, Y., Feng, S., Lu, Q., Yu, Q., Sui, D., Rothbart, M. K., Fan, M., et al. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0707678104 · Cited by 1,597
Research on attention networks as a model for the integration of psychological science.
Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085516 · Cited by 1,569
Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin.
Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Young, S. E., DeFries, J. C., Corley, R. P., & Hewitt, J. K. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.201 · Cited by 1,547
Metadata
- Authors
- Duncan, J., Seitz, R. J., Kolodny, J., Bor, D., Herzog, H., Ahmed, A., Newell, F. N., & Emslie, H.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2000-07-21
- Volume
- 289
- Issue
- 5478
- Pages
- 457-460
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1992149782
- Cited by
- 1,035
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 50.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Neural Basis for General Intelligence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.289.5478.457
- The paper
- Duncan, J., Seitz, R. J., Kolodny, J., Bor, D., Herzog, H., Ahmed, A., Newell, F. N., & Emslie, H. (2000). A Neural Basis for General Intelligence. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5478.457
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.