Cited by 1,569Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Research on attention networks as a model for the integration of psychological science.

Posner, Michael I., Rothbart, Mary K.·2007·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

As Titchener pointed out more than one hundred years ago, attention is at the center of the psychological enterprise. Attention research investigates how voluntary control and subjective experience arise from and regulate our behavior. In recent years, attention has been one of the fastest growing of all fields within cognitive psychology and cognitive neuroscience. This review examines attention as characterized by linking common neural networks with individual differences in their efficient utilization. The development of attentional networks is partly specified by genes, but is also open to specific experiences through the actions of caregivers and the culture. We believe that the connection between neural networks, genes, and socialization provides a common approach to all aspects of human cognition and emotion. Pursuit of this approach can provide a basis for psychology that unifies social, cultural, differential, experimental, and physiological areas, and allows normal development to serve as a baseline for understanding various forms of pathology. D.O. Hebb proposed this approach 50 years ago in his volume Organization of Behavior and continued with introductory textbooks that dealt with all of the topics of psychology in a common framework. Use of a common network approach to psychological science may allow a foundation for predicting and understanding human behavior in its varied forms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085516

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K.
Affiliations
University of Oregon (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
2007-01-01
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
1-23
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W2078099808
Cited by
1,569
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 89 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 85 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 111 · 2016: 85 · 2015: 92 · 2014: 96 · 2013: 94 · 2012: 87
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
attentional networks, attention, individual differences, artificial neural networks, gene-environment interaction, socialization, cognitive development, cognitive neuroscience, cognitive psychology, human behavior prediction
MeSH terms
Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Behavior, Brain, Child, Child, Preschool, Culture, Humans, Infant, Models, Psychological, Nerve Net, Neuropsychology, Psychology, Socialization, Temperament

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review