Cited by 347Fish Ecology and Management StudiesMarine and fisheries researchMarine animal studies overview

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recovery and Management Options for Spring/Summer Chinook Salmon in the Columbia River Basin

Abstract

Construction of four dams on the lower Snake River (in northwestern United States) between 1961 and 1975 altered salmon spawning habitat, elevated smolt and adult migration mortality, and contributed to severe declines of Snake River salmon populations. By applying a matrix model to long-term population data, we found that (i) dam passage improvements have dramatically mitigated direct mortality associated with dams; (ii) even if main stem survival were elevated to 100%, Snake River spring/summer chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) would probably continue to decline toward extinction; and (iii) modest reductions in first-year mortality or estuarine mortality would reverse current population declines.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.290.5493.977

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

1 of the 3 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. National Research Council Upstream: Salmon and Society in the Pacific Northwest (National Academy Press Washington DC 1996).
  2. Waples R., Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 17, 8 (1995).
  3. Supplemental Web material is available on Science Online at www.sciencemag.org/feature/data/1053311.shl.
  4. J. Williams S. Smith W. Muir N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. in press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 347

Metadata

Authors
Kareiva, P., Marvier, M., & McClure, M.
Affiliations
  • NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Northwest Fisheries Science Center (US)
  • Santa Clara University (US)
Corresponding author
McClure, Michelle
Venue
Science
Published
2000-11-03
Volume
290
Issue
5493
Pages
977-979
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2071272508
Cited by
347
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 17
FWCI
20.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
  • Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
Keywords
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, Snake River dams, salmon population decline, extinction risk, smolt mortality, population recovery, matrix population models, Columbia River Basin
MeSH terms
Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Female, Fresh Water, Male, Models, Biological, Population Dynamics, Salmon, Northwestern United States, Models, Statistical, Survival Rate, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review