Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Protection Against Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Resulting from Bites of Uninfected Sand Flies

Kamhawi, Shaden, Belkaid, Yasmine, Modi, Govind, Rowton, Edgar, Sacks, David·2000·Science

Abstract

Despite the fact that Leishmania are transmitted exclusively by sand flies, none of the experimental models of leishmaniasis have established infection via sand fly bites. Here we describe a reproducible murine model of Leishmania major infection transmitted by Phlebotomus papatasi . Prior exposure of mice to bites of uninfected sand flies conferred powerful protection against Leishmania major that was associated with a strong delayed-type hypersensitivity response and with interferon-γ production at the site of parasite delivery. These results have important implications for the epidemiology of cutaneous leishmaniasis and suggest a vaccination strategy against this and possibly other vector-borne diseases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.290.5495.1351

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Kamhawi, S., Belkaid, Y., Modi, G., Rowton, E., & Sacks, D.
Venue
Science
Published
2000-11-17
Volume
290
Issue
5495
Pages
1351-1354
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2038533031
Cited by
347
References
0
FWCI
11.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protection Against Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Resulting from Bites of Uninfected Sand Flies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.290.5495.1351
The paper
Kamhawi, S., Belkaid, Y., Modi, G., Rowton, E., & Sacks, D. (2000). Protection Against Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Resulting from Bites of Uninfected Sand Flies. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5495.1351

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.