The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The CRISPR Craze
Abstract
A bacterial immune system yields a potentially revolutionary genome-editing technique.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The markedly high efficiency of CRISPR/Cas systems coupled with the above-mentioned advantages over other methods justify the CRISPR "epidemic" that the scientific community experienced in 2013.
“The markedly high efficiency of CRISPR/Cas systems coupled with the above-mentioned advantages over other methods justify the CRISPR “epidemic” that the scientific community experienced in 2013 [62,81,100,101].”
From CRISPR-Cas: Converting A Bacterial Defence Mechanism into A State-of-the-Art Genetic Manipulation Tool (2019) · cites this paper as [100]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for multiplex genome editing in plants
Xing, H.-L., Dong, L., Wang, Z.-P., Zhang, H.-Y., Han, C.-Y., Liu, B., Wang, X.-C., & Chen, Q.-J. (2014) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-014-0327-y · Cited by 1,684
Classification and evolution of type II CRISPR-Cas systems
Chylinski, K., Makarova, K. S., Charpentier, E., & Koonin, E. V. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku241 · Cited by 498
CasOT: A genome-wide cas9/gRNA off-target searching tool
Xiao, A., Cheng, Z., Kong, L., Zhu, Z., Lin, S., Gao, G., & Zhang, B. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt764 · Cited by 363
DNA methylation in social insects: how epigenetics can control behavior and longevity
Yan, H., Bonasio, R., Simola, D. F., Liebig, J., Berger, S. L., & Reinberg, D. (2015) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-020803 · Cited by 183
Loureiro, A., & da Silva, G. J. (2019) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics8010018 · Cited by 129
Biomedical applications of mRNA nanomedicine
Xiong, Q., Lee, G. Y., Ding, J., Li, W., & Shi, J. (2018) · Nano Research · doi:10.1007/s12274-018-2146-1 · Cited by 125
Advances in genomics for adapting crops to climate change
Scheben, A., Yuan, Y., & Edwards, D. (2016) · Current Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cpb.2016.09.001 · Cited by 117
Genome Editing Weds CRISPR: What Is in It for Phytoremediation?
Basharat, Z., Novo, L. A. B., & Yasmin, A. (2018) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants7030051 · Cited by 104
Selective targeting of KRAS oncogenic alleles by CRISPR/Cas9 inhibits proliferation of cancer cells
Lee, W., Lee, J. H., Jun, S., Lee, J. H., & Bang, D. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-30205-2 · Cited by 53
A CRISPR way for accelerating cereal crop improvement: Progress and challenges
Basu, U., Riaz Ahmed, S., Bhat, B. A., Anwar, Z., Ali, A., Ijaz, A., Gulzar, A., Bibi, A., Tyagi, A., Nebapure, S. M., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.866976 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Pennisi, E.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2013-08-23
- Volume
- 341
- Issue
- 6148
- Pages
- 833-836
- ISSN
- 0036-8075
- 1095-9203
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
