The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prediction of Chemical Carcinogenicity in Rodents from in Vitro Genetic Toxicity Assays
Abstract
Four widely used in vitro assays for genetic toxicity were evaluated for their ability to predict the carcinogenicity of selected chemicals in rodents. These assays were mutagenesis in Salmonella and mouse lymphoma cells and chromosome aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Seventy-three chemicals recently tested in 2-year carcinogenicity studies conducted by the National Cancer Institute and the National Toxicology Program were used in this evaluation. Test results from the four in vitro assays did not show significant differences in individual concordance with the rodent carcinogenicity results; the concordance of each assay was approximately 60 percent. Within the limits of this study there was no evidence of complementarity among the four assays, and no battery of tests constructed from these assays improved substantially on the overall performance of the Salmonella assay. The in vitro assays which represented a range of three cell types and four end points did show substantial agreement among themselves, indicating that chemicals positive in one in vitro assay tended to be positive in the other in vitro assays.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Williams, G. M., Kroes, R., & Munro, I. C. (2000) · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1006/rtph.1999.1371 · Cited by 864
RetractedGossen, J. A., de Leeuw, W. J., Tan, C. H., Zwarthoff, E. C., Berends, F., Lohman, P. H., Knook, D. L., & Vijg, J. (1989) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.86.20.7971 · Cited by 494
Morita, T., Asano, N., Awogi, T., Sasaki, Y. F., Sato, S.-I., Shimada, H., Sutou, S., Suzuki, T., Wakata, A., Sofuni, T., et al. (1997) · Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/s1383-5718(96)00070-8 · Cited by 277
The photogenotoxicity of titanium dioxide particles
Nakagawa, Y., Wakuri, S., Sakamoto, K., & Tanaka, N. (1997) · Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/s1383-5718(97)00126-5 · Cited by 200
Bomhard, E. M., & Herbold, B. A. (2005) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.1080/10408440500442384 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Tennant, R. W., Margolin, B. H., Shelby, M. D., Zeiger, E., Haseman, J. K., Spalding, J., Caspary, W., Resnick, M., Stasiewicz, S., Anderson, B., & Minor, R.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1987-05-22
- Volume
- 236
- Issue
- 4804
- Pages
- 933-941
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2064637938
- Cited by
- 811
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 44.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of Chemical Carcinogenicity in Rodents from in Vitro Genetic Toxicity Assays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.3554512
- The paper
- Tennant, R. W., Margolin, B. H., Shelby, M. D., Zeiger, E., Haseman, J. K., Spalding, J., Caspary, W., Resnick, M., Stasiewicz, S., Anderson, B., & Minor, R. (1987). Prediction of Chemical Carcinogenicity in Rodents from in Vitro Genetic Toxicity Assays. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3554512
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.