Cited by 120Misinformation and Its ImpactsVaccine Coverage and HesitancyCommunication and COVID-19 Impact

Officials gird for a war on vaccine misinformation

Cornwall, Warren·2020·Science

Abstract

Fears of a rushed COVID-19 vaccine and rise of social media demand new messaging strategy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.369.6499.14

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Misinformation spread through multiple channels could have a considerable effect on the acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine.

    “Misinformation spread through multiple channels could have a considerable effect on the acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine8.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cornwall, W.
Corresponding author
Cornwall, Warren
Venue
Science
Published
2020-07-03
Volume
369
Issue
6499
Pages
14-15
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W3038426841
Cited by
119
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 12
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
Keywords
vaccine misinformation, COVID-19 vaccines, social media, public health communication, vaccine hesitancy, health communication strategies
MeSH terms
Anti-Vaccination Movement, COVID-19, COVID-19 Vaccines, Humans, Pneumonia, Viral, United States, Viral Vaccines, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review