Cited by 7International Science and DiplomacyHistory of Science and Natural HistoryResearch, Science, and Academia

Accusations of Colonial Science Fly after Eruption

Pease, Roland·2021·Science

Abstract

Congolese volcano watchers say European data monopoly hampered Nyiragongo forecasts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.372.6548.1248

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The foundations of geology in general and volcanology in particular are inseparable from imperial colonialism.

    “Earth scientists themselves have begun to recognize that the foundations of geology in general (Scarlett, 2022) and volcanology in particular (Pease, 2021;Scarlett et al., 2022) are inseparable from imperial colonialism”

    From An Inside Sun: Lickanantay Volcanology in the Salar de Atacama (2022) · cites this paper as Pease, 2021

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pease, R.
Affiliations
Roland Pease is a journalist in London.
Corresponding author
Pease, Roland
Venue
Science
Published
2021-06-18
Volume
372
Issue
6548
Pages
1248-1249
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W3168607285
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Science and Diplomacy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Natural History
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
Keywords
Nyiragongo volcano, volcanic eruptions, eruption forecasting, colonial science, scientific data access

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review