Cited by 25SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchLegal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 ChallengesVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

What went wrong with CureVac's mRNA vaccine?

Cohen, Jon·2021·Science

Abstract

Company blames variants of the coronavirus, but type of RNA may have been key.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.372.6549.1381

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The low vaccination dosage of CVnCoV and the use of unmodified nucleotides might have contributed to its performance in phase II clinical trials compared to licensed COVID-19 vaccines.

    “The low vaccination dosage of CVnCoV and the use of unmodified nucleotides might have contributed to the performance of this vaccine in phase II clinical trials compared to the licensed COVID-19 vaccine.428”

    From Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development (2022) · cites this paper as [428]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohen, J.
Corresponding author
Cohen, Jon
Venue
Science
Published
2021-06-25
Volume
372
Issue
6549
Pages
1381-1381
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W3174443753
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Legal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
mRNA vaccines, COVID-19 vaccines, SARS-CoV-2 variants, vaccine failure, lipid nanoparticle formulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review