The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Observing the unexpected enhances infants’ learning and exploration
Open accessAbstract
Given the overwhelming quantity of information available from the environment, how do young learners know what to learn about and what to ignore? We found that 11-month-old infants (N = 110) used violations of prior expectations as special opportunities for learning. The infants were shown events that violated expectations about object behavior or events that were nearly identical but did not violate expectations. The sight of an object that violated expectations enhanced learning and promoted information-seeking behaviors; specifically, infants learned more effectively about objects that committed violations, explored those objects more, and engaged in hypothesis-testing behaviors that reflected the particular kind of violation seen. Thus, early in life, expectancy violations offer a wedge into the problem of what to learn.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It is a crucial factor that modulates positively the individuals' learning experience and outcomes [55, 21].”
From GPT-3-Driven Pedagogical Agents to Train Children’s Curious Question-Asking Skills (2024) · cites this paper as [55]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5294.1926 · Cited by 5,659
Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.87.6.532 · Cited by 3,023
How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction
Tenenbaum, J. B., Kemp, C., Griffiths, T. L., & Goodman, N. D. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1192788 · Cited by 1,815
Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.005 · Cited by 1,648
Spelke, E. S., Breinlinger, K., Macomber, J., & Jacobson, K. C. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.4.605 · Cited by 1,410
Spelke, E. S., & Kinzler, K. D. (2007) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00569.x · Cited by 1,089
Object permanence in five-month-old infants
Renée Baillargeon, B., Spelke, E. S., & Wasserman, S. S. (1985) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90008-3 · Cited by 1,018
Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning
Tenenbaum, J. B., Griffiths, T. L., & Kemp, C. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.009 · Cited by 880
Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers
Véronique Izard, A., Sann, C., Spelke, E. S., & Stréri, A. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0812142106 · Cited by 783
Attribution of Dispositional States by 12-Month-Olds
Kuhlmeier, V. A., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2003) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.01454 · Cited by 506
Large-Number Addition and Subtraction by 9-Month-Old Infants
McCrink, K., & Wynn, K. (2004) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00755.x · Cited by 504
Spatiotemporal continuity, smoothness of motion and object identity in infancy
Spelke, E. S., Kestenbaum, R., Simons, D. J., & Wein, D. (1995) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-835x.1995.tb00669.x · Cited by 462
Renée Baillargeon, B. (1986) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(86)90052-1 · Cited by 437
Core Knowledge of Geometry in an Amazonian Indigene Group
Dehaene, S., Izard, V., Pica, P., & Spelke, E. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1121739 · Cited by 415
The Intermodal Representation of Speech in Infants
Kuhl, P. K., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1984) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/s0163-6383(84)80050-8 · Cited by 310
Intuitions about support in 4.5-month-old infants
Needham, A. W., & Renée Baillargeon, B. (1993) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(93)90002-d · Cited by 301
Pure Reasoning in 12-Month-Old Infants as Probabilistic Inference
Téglás, E., Vul, E., Girotto, V., Gonzalez, M., Tenenbaum, J., & Bonatti, L. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1196404 · Cited by 296
Children balance theories and evidence in exploration, explanation, and learning
Bonawitz, E. B., van Schijndel, T. J. P., Friel, D., & Schulz, L. (2012) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.12.002 · Cited by 262
Perception of partly occluded objects by young chicks
Regolin, L., & Vallortígara, G. (1995) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03205456 · Cited by 257
Infants’ understanding of everyday social interactions: A dual process account
Gredebäck, G., & Melinder, A. M. D. (2009) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.004 · Cited by 223
The origins of inquiry: inductive inference and exploration in early childhood
Schulz, L. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.004 · Cited by 209
Legare, C. H. (2011) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01691.x · Cited by 202
Infant brains detect arithmetic errors
Berger, A., Tzur, G., & Posner, M. I. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0605350103 · Cited by 196
Believing what you’re told: Young children’s trust in unexpected testimony about the physical world
Jaswal, V. K. (2010) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.06.002 · Cited by 192
Using near-infrared spectroscopy to assess neural activation during object processing in infants
Wilcox, T. G., Bortfeld, H., Woods, R., Wruck, E., & Boas, D. A. (2005) · Journal of Biomedical Optics · doi:10.1117/1.1852551 · Cited by 152
Experience and geometry: controlled-rearing studies with chicks
Chiandetti, C., & Vallortígara, G. (2009) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0297-x · Cited by 122
Camras, L. A., Meng, Z., Ujiie, T., Dharamsi, S., Miyake, K., Oster, H., Wang, L., Cruz, J. E., Murdoch, A., & Campos, J. J. (2002) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.2.2.179 · Cited by 101
Location memory in healthy preterm and full-term infants
Wilcox, T. G., Nadel, L., & Rosser, R. A. (1996) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/s0163-6383(96)90031-4 · Cited by 72
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- N. Chomsky in Language and Learning: The Debate Between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky M. Piatelli-Palmarini Ed. (Routledge and Kegan Paul London 1980) pp. 393–396.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Building machines that learn and think like people
Lake, B. M., Ullman, T. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gershman, S. J. (2017) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x16001837 · Cited by 2,550
Motor Development: Embodied, Embedded, Enculturated, and Enabling
Adolph, K. E., & Hoch, J. E. (2019) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102836 · Cited by 580
“Of course, infants in laboratory experiments deliberately explore objects to learn about surprising or ambiguous properties (Sim & Xu 2017, Stahl & Feigenson 2015) and readily navigate obstacles to get to a toy or caregiver on the other side.”
BackgroundAccessing the Inaccessible: Redefining Play as a Spectrum
Zosh, J. M., Hirsh‐Pasek, K., Hopkins, E. J., Jensen, H., Liu, C. Y., Neale, D., Solis, S. L., & Whitebread, D. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01124 · Cited by 565
Intrinsic motivation, curiosity, and learning
Oudeyer, P., Gottlieb, J. P., & Lopes, M. C. (2016) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.05.005 · Cited by 453
“In this view (Kang et al., 2009; Stahl and Feigenson, 2015), learning in itself does not have consequences on state curiosity and motivation.”
BackgroundChildhood as a solution to explore–exploit tensions
Alison Gopnik, C. (2020) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0502 · Cited by 354
“Even infants systematically explore surprising events [70].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Stahl, A. E., & Feigenson, L.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stahl, Aimee E.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2015-04-03
- Volume
- 348
- Issue
- 6230
- Pages
- 91-94
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- PMC
- PMC5861377
- OpenAlex
- W1980054804
- Cited by
- 617
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 9
- FWCI
- 93.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (DGE-1232825)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- expectancy violation, infant learning, exploration, information seeking, hypothesis testing, prior expectations, object behavior, surprise, early learning, cognitive development
- MeSH terms
- Child Development, Cognition, Exploratory Behavior, Humans, Infant, Learning, Knowledge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
