Cited by 1,225Forest Management and PolicyForest Insect Ecology and ManagementFire effects on ecosystems

Boreal forest health and global change

Gauthier, S., Bernier, P., Kuuluvainen, T., Shvidenko, A. Z., Schepaschenko, D. G.·2015·Science

Abstract

The boreal forest, one of the largest biomes on Earth, provides ecosystem services that benefit society at levels ranging from local to global. Currently, about two-thirds of the area covered by this biome is under some form of management, mostly for wood production. Services such as climate regulation are also provided by both the unmanaged and managed boreal forests. Although most of the boreal forests have retained the resilience to cope with current disturbances, projected environmental changes of unprecedented speed and amplitude pose a substantial threat to their health. Management options to reduce these threats are available and could be implemented, but economic incentives and a greater focus on the boreal biome in international fora are needed to support further adaptation and mitigation actions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aaa9092

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The poor understanding of industrial pollution effects is particularly true for the boreal forests of the Northern Hemisphere.

    “This is particularly true for the boreal forests of the Northern Hemisphere (Gauthier et al ., 2015; Girardin et al ., 2016)”

    From Ecological and conceptual consequences of Arctic pollution (2020) · cites this paper as Gauthier et al ., 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gauthier, S., Bernier, P., Kuuluvainen, T., Shvidenko, A. Z., & Schepaschenko, D. G.
Affiliations
  • Canadian Forest Service (CA)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Ecosystems Services and Management Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria.
  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT)
Corresponding author
Gauthier, S.
Venue
Science
Published
2015-08-21
Volume
349
Issue
6250
Pages
819-822
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1874639023
Cited by
1,225
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 115 · 2025: 158 · 2024: 148 · 2023: 155 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 133 · 2020: 119 · 2019: 97 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Forest Insect Ecology and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
Keywords
boreal forest, forest health, global change, ecosystem services, climate regulation, forest management, timber production, climate change adaptation, climate change mitigation, forest resilience, environmental disturbance
MeSH terms
Conservation of Natural Resources, Trees, Climate Change, Taiga

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review